My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01 (2)
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
061907
>
01 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2007 2:59:53 PM
Creation date
6/15/2007 2:59:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/19/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
those fees would go toward more regional projects and not projects that would provide <br />mitigations for this particular development. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson clarified that approximately $1.7 to $1.8 million is local traffic impact fees and <br />the remainder is about $200,000 which goes to the regional account. 20% of that <br />$200,000 can be used for local projects such as when the City used it for the new BART <br />station. <br /> <br />Councilmember Sullivan referred to the truck traffic on-site monitor and questioned how <br />this worked. Mr. Knoedler said the owner of the shopping center is responsible for <br />designating an individual who will act as a monitor to make sure delivery trucks are going <br />and coming in directions they are supposed to. It will not necessarily have to be all day, <br />but they are responsible for making sure that the truck drivers and their companies are <br />doing the right thing. If not, they are responsible for working with the City to resolve this. <br />He questioned the success rate the City has had on Valley and indicated they recently <br />received a memo from the Assistant City Attorney that talked about what legally can and <br />cannot be done. Mr. Iserson felt this was a specific project that the City can condition and <br />that the memo addressed passing an ordinance affecting traffic circulation citywide. <br /> <br />Councilmember Sullivan said the actual green building ordinance applies for the Home <br />Depot building, but does not apply to the other smaller buildings and questioned why the <br />entire development was not required. Mr. Iserson said staff would be working with the <br />applicant to do just that because they have expressed their commitment towards achieving <br />green building status and the ordinance also encourages smaller buildings to meet green <br />building status. <br /> <br />Mayor Hosterman felt the 20,000 square foot number had to do with downtown <br />Pleasanton, and Mr. Iserson said the 20,000 is in the ordinance throughout the City, <br />except for the downtown, which is totally exempt. <br /> <br />Councilmember Sullivan referred to the economic issues and the study that staff <br />performed of the business for the new Home Depot, noting approximately 20% would <br />come initially from the existing store and then 10% of the revenues would come from the <br />impact on other small businesses in the area. He said there are some smaller stores in the <br />Stanley Business Park leaving 70% and asked where that came from. Ms. Wagner said <br />the 70% comes from the region. He indicated he had a study done by Iowa State <br />University that discusses the impact of big box building materials stores on host towns and <br />surrounding communities. The study talks about the zero sum game theory that <br />essentially says with the exception of population growth, there is a fixed market for these <br />kinds of stores. <br /> <br />Ms. Wagner noted the growth in building supplies anticipated, as the city’s housing stock <br />is aging and there will be a demand for improving homes and building supplies. She felt <br />the zero sum game looks at a much larger area, so if they were looking at Alameda and <br />Contra Costa County wide, it could be a zero sum game, meaning that we are taking from <br />other businesses outside Pleasanton more so than 10%. She said staff only looked at the <br />impact on Pleasanton. <br /> <br /> <br />Councilmember Sullivan referred to dollars staying in the community versus going out of <br />the community. He said there were a couple of studies that talk about locally owned <br /> <br />City Council Minutes 8 May 15, 2007 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.