My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
061907
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2007 2:58:12 PM
Creation date
6/15/2007 2:58:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/19/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Park, and as growth stabilizes, the tax revenue from the business park will become even more <br />critical. She saw several statistics that show the majority of employees of the park do not live in <br />Pleasanton and if the city wants to continue to enjoy the tax revenues, then Pleasanton should <br />do its fair share to design and implement uncongested roadways to facilitate getting workers in <br />and out of the park. If the traffic study indicates that the extension will reduce congestion for all <br />users, then the Council needs to keep the extension in the General Plan and ensure it is built in <br />a timely manner. <br /> <br />Judy Symcox, addressed the City Council, felt there should be a justification as to why the <br />Council would take Stoneridge out, said she moved in 1974 knowing that Las Positas was going <br />through which was changed and Stoneridge Drive was specifically created to provide access for <br />employees to get to their jobs. Some of the construction of Stoneridge Drive extension results <br />in significant re-distribution of traffic volumes and provides relief on heavily traveled routes such <br />as Hacienda, Santa Rita, and Valley Avenue between Santa Rita.” Without Stoneridge Drive <br />extension, a total of 9 intersections would fail to meet minimum standards and would require <br />costly mitigations and intersection improvements. <br /> <br />Richard Morse, addressed the City Council, said he is opposed to the Stoneridge extension <br />build-out, does not believe it will have a favorable impact with the quality of life for the entire city <br />as demonstrated, thanked the Council for not being held hostage to failures on the county and <br />state level for trying to use Stoneridge as a method to implement regional traffic solutions. <br /> <br />John Carroll, addressed the City Council, appreciates staff’s presentation, said he was very <br />disappointed with the initial report and now realizes the numbers are a 2030 projection. He felt <br />there was quite a bit of time between now and then to determine what improvements we may or <br />may not see in the regional traffic network. His main focus is the 9 intersections still at failure <br />with and without, he understands there is some relief, sympathized with the Valley <br />neighborhood, is hopeful we can take resources and do some improvement to alleviate <br />problems in that area, but he does not think the extension is a balancing act. <br /> <br />David Bouchard, addressed the City Council on behalf of the Pleasanton Chamber of <br />Commerce, said they are very much in support of keeping the Stoneridge Drive extension in the <br />General Plan, said it has been planned for over 20 years, said the community has been <br />designed and growing around this fact, said the transportation network will be more balanced <br />and not place disproportionate impacts on people who live and work throughout Pleasanton. <br />Overall traffic safety will be improved, emergency services will be improved, it will allow citizens <br />faster and more direct access to Valley Care Hospital and it will make the arterial system more <br />efficient, more convenient and less polluted, and many residents and employees will be able to <br />travel fewer overall miles meaning less emissions. The extension will allow Pleasanton to <br />maintain its current look and feel and without it, mitigation like 3 wide turn lanes at Santa Rita <br />and Valley and other street widenings will result in last greenbelts and landscaping and more <br />paving. He felt the extension was good for local business, said many employees will benefit and <br />will allow for better access to business at Staples Ranch, and it will have a positive economic <br />impact on the city’s fiscal sustainability. <br /> <br />Bill van Gelder, addressed the City Council, complimented the Council and staff for continuing <br />to develop and maintain a traffic model, said he was the past international director of the <br />Institute of Transportation Engineers and knows of no other model in the world that would <br />provide better information that what is being used now. He complimented the Council regarding <br />pursuing improvements on SR 84 which would greatly improve the regional tri-valley network, <br />reduce congestion and cut-through traffic, as well. In looking at Pleasanton he finds no uniform <br /> <br />Workshop Minutes 18 April 24, 2007 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.