My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
060507
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2007 12:09:11 PM
Creation date
6/1/2007 12:08:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/15/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Citv of Santa Rosa. A council member and staff planner advised that the dispensaries <br />were operating without significant calls for police service. An attorney from the City <br />Attorney's Office advised that the Police Department is responding to more calls for <br />illegal cultivation of marijuana in residences in excess of the limits allowed by State law, <br />or by persons who are not qualified patients or caregivers. <br />City of West Hollywood. A staff person from a council member's office advised that the <br />dispensaries were operating without significant calls for police service. <br />City of Placerville. A council member and the chief of police advised that the one <br />dispensary in Placerville operated without significant calls for police service for six <br />months. After that six month period, the dispensary operator closed at his own volition. <br />Generally speaking these cities see community value in making these dispensaries <br />available to the public. These cities advise that the dispensaries within their jurisdictions <br />are not generating significant calls for police service operate pursuant to local regulatory <br />provisions which generally limit the maximum number of dispensaries, do not allow <br />dispensaries to locate within a certain distance of another dispensary, require <br />dispensaries to be a specific distance from schools & parks, set hours of operation, <br />require certain security measures, etc. Any interest in allowing medical marijuana <br />dispensaries to operate in the City should include such regulatory provisions in a <br />permitting process adopted by ordinance. <br />IV. Federal Legislation <br />Proposed legislation is currently pending in Congress, known as the States' Rights to <br />Medical Marijuana Act (H.R. 2233), which would allow states in which medical marijuana <br />may be prescribed or recommended by a physician from being prohibited or restricted by <br />the Federal Controlled Substances Act. Introduced in 2003, the bill is currently with the <br />House of Representatives Subcommittee on Health. <br />If this bill, or a similar bill, becomes law, then the conflict between Federal law and <br />California's Compassionate Use Act would be resolved. At such time, staff could return <br />to the City Council with additional options for allowing medical marijuana dispensaries to <br />be operated within the City. <br />ADDITIONAL OPTIONS <br />In addition to staffs recommendation, as reflected in the attached report, the following <br />additional options are also available: <br />A. Track Federal legislation regarding medical marijuana, and return to the City <br />Council with options if Federal law is amended to allow the use of medical <br />marijuana. <br />B. Communicate in writing to our local congressional delegation requesting support <br />for H.R. 2233. <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.