My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
060507
>
11 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2007 1:40:42 PM
Creation date
6/1/2007 8:43:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/5/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Proposed Property Lines <br />PUBLIC NOTICE <br />Fencing up to 42" (per P.M.C. <br />18.84.OSOD) <br />Staff originally sent notices of the Planning Commission's public hearing on this item to <br />all property owners, tenants, and residents located within 1,000-feet of the subject prop- <br />erty on March 14, 2007. <br />^ Mr. Jon Harvey of 2790 Smallwood Court, spoke to the staff planner on March 28, <br />2007 and expressed concern that the project was originally approved as a secondary <br />unit. He feels that approval of the PUD and subsequent subdivision undermines the <br />intent of the secondary unit ordinance. <br />Staff Response: The subject property is located in the high- density residential area <br />of the Downtown District. This is the area generally bounded by Peters Avenue to the <br />east, Arroyo Del Valle to the north, the Union Pacific Railroad to the west, and Plea- <br />santon Avenue/Bernal Court/Old Bernal Avenue to the south. At this location, staff <br />would have supported the project if originally submitted as a PUD development plan <br />and therefore supports the project now. Staff support of this approval is solely based <br />on the subject's location in the high-density residential area within the Downtown <br />District and does not transfer to similar support for the removal of deed restrictions <br />on secondary units in any other residential area of the Downtown District or else- <br />where in the City. <br />^ Bonnie and Fred Krichbaum, 303 Neal Street, sent an email on March 28, 2007 re- <br />questing acontinuance of the project to a later Planning Commission meeting. The <br />Krichbaums oppose the removal of the deed restrictions on the proposed project as <br />setting a poor precedent to have a property developed under one set of specifications <br />Item 6. a., PUD-61 Page 7 of 12 May 9, 2007 <br />'. "` Area to Remain Clear of All Structures Fencing up to 6' (per P.M.C. <br />18.84.080C) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.