My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
060507
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2007 12:28:20 PM
Creation date
6/1/2007 8:35:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/5/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
heritage architecture. The current proposal to subdivide this lot would not change the <br />existing physical character of the site and would be consistent with the Specific Plan <br />and General Plan. Therefore, staff and the Planning Commission see a distinction <br />between allowing this proposed subdivision and allowing a similar subdivision with a <br />second unit in the neighborhoods designated as Medium or Low Density Residential. <br />Parking for the proposed project will remain essentially "as is" in relation to the current <br />parking situation. The existing two-car garage will be located on the 730 Peters Avenue <br />property. The property at 403 Saint Mary Street has a 9-foot by 37-foot paved parking <br />pad that is sufficient for tandem parking for two vehicles. Access to the parking area is <br />gained by an approximately 24-foot wide curb cut off of Peters Avenue. No new curb <br />cuts will be required as part of this project. The existing driveway will continue to serve <br />both properties. A condition of project approval requires the applicants to create both a <br />cross-access easement and a maintenance agreement for the shared driveway. <br />Please refer to the Planning Commission staff report dated May 9, 2007 (Attachment 4) <br />for a detailed analysis of this project. <br />Planning Commission <br />The proposed project was originally scheduled as a consent item to be reviewed by the <br />Planning Commission on March 28, 2007. The day of the meeting, Bonnie and Fred <br />Krichbaum of 303 Neal Street requested the item be continued until a later date. On <br />May 9, 2007, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed project. By a <br />4 to 1 vote, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the project, subject to <br />the conditions recommended by staff and as shown in Exhibit B. The May 9, 2007 <br />Planning Commission meeting minutes are attached for the Council's information <br />(Attachment 5). <br />Public Notice and Comment <br />Notice of this application was sent to all property owners living within 1,000 feet of the <br />subject property. As of the writing of this staff report, staff has received a copy of an <br />email sent by Linda and George Garbarino (Attachment 6). The Garbarinos express <br />opposition to the "retroactive approval" to split off a granny unit into asingle-family <br />home and to the creation of two smaller lots from a single parcel. The Garbarinos state <br />that the proposed project is prohibited by codes and General Plan regulations. <br />Staff notes that, as stated above, the proposed development is consistent with the <br />underlying land use designation. The subject property is located in the High Density <br />Residential area of the Downtown District. This is the area generally bounded by Peters <br />Avenue to the east, Arroyo Del Valle to the north, the Union Pacific Railroad to the west, <br />and Pleasanton Avenue/Bernal Court/Old Bernal Avenue to the south. At this location, <br />staff would have supported the project as two separate lots if originally submitted as a <br />PUD development plan and, therefore, supports the project now. Staff support of this <br />approval is solely based on the property's location in the High Density Residential area <br />within the Downtown District and does not transfer to similar support for allowing <br />subdivision on lots with second units in any single-family residential area of the <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.