My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 08/24/71
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1971
>
PC 08/24/71
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:40:51 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 4:40:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/24/1971
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 08/24/71
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4y$AS"N~°y CITY of PLEASANTON <br />~ ~'i . <br />4~ <br />`~~~° Planning Commission <br />+rr so s <br />MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />D afie August 24, 1971 <br />Time ; s:lo PM <br />PIaCe: Pleasanton Justice Court <br />the Commissioner's packets were not complete <br />and they could not make an evaluation this <br />evening. <br />Dr. Long addressed the Commission. He state <br />that even a two week continuance would cost <br />the residents of Pleasanton Greens $44,000. <br />He stated that they have everything that the <br />Commission would want and they are very happ <br />with the staff report. <br />Chairman Garrigan stated that with the <br />information they have, the Commission is not <br />ready to make a decision and he then moved t <br />this matter be continued until the next <br />regular meeting. This motion was seconded <br />by Commissioner Pons. At this point Dr. <br />Long again interjected a few comments. He <br />said that they understood that their submitt <br />would be sufficient and said that a continua <br />would penalize the project. <br />Commissioner Hirst requested that the public <br />hearing be reopened in the hope that at <br />least some progress could be made. Chairman <br />Garrigan disagreed by saying that it would <br />not be fair as it will waste the applicant's <br />and the Commission's time if we are going <br />to have to continue the matter anyway and it <br />would be better to discuss it in full when <br />it is rescheduled. Rather than be pressured <br />into making a decision he stated that he <br />would rather call for the vote on the <br />continuance. The vote was taken with Com- <br />missioners Hirst and Wood voting no, and all <br />other Commissioner's voting aye. The matter <br />was continued until the next regular meeting. <br />Commissioner Wood made a statement explaining <br />his vote. He felt that the advance public <br />notice which brought so many people to the <br />meeting made it a difficult decision. <br />t <br />e <br />- 5 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.