My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 08/08/72
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1972
>
PC 08/08/72
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:45:22 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 4:12:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/8/1972
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 08/08/72
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
q~$AS"N~~y CITY of PLEASANTON <br />~ ~ '~~ • <br />.a <br />...o. <br />*° Planning Commission <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />Dcfe : August 8, 1972 <br />Time ; 8:0o P.M. <br />PIGCe; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Highways inferring that nothing <br />definite has been decided on this <br />particular interchange going in. <br />It was Mr. Mariani's contention, <br />that this was sufficient proof that <br />nothing has been decided regarding <br />a definite interchange for this <br />center. <br />Discussion followed on the question <br />of population justification and <br />Mr. Mariani inferred that there is <br />the possibility an interchange will <br />not go in at this location for as <br />long as 10 years. <br />Commissioner Wood then remarked that <br />the letter read by Mr. Mariani <br />inferred the opinion of just one <br />individual in the Highway Division <br />of present policy on approval or <br />denial of interchange construction. <br />Mr. Mariani then remarked that the <br />Commission could solicit a letter fr <br />the Highway Commission themselves <br />for verification if they so desired. <br />Mr. Mariani next determined that the <br />Stoneson site was originally zoned <br />in the County and in 1964 was brough <br />into the City under annexation pro- <br />ceedings. Discussion followed. <br />Mr. Mariani then asked whether <br />Livingston & Blayney had been solici <br />regarding their opinion on the most <br />feasible regional center site. <br />Mr. Castro advised that Livingston & <br />Blayney has been informed of the <br />City's desires to locate a center in <br />Pleasanton. Authorization has been <br />given to the consultants to review <br />the remaining lands in terms of the <br />highest and best land use and in <br />terms of its circulation. <br />d <br />-9- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.