My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 90196
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
RES 90196
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2012 2:34:34 PM
Creation date
8/13/1999 6:38:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/16/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Housing Element policies 5 and 6 contain specific objectives for <br />providing and maintaining an adequate supply of'rental and owner <br />occupied units through 1995 and to buildout of the General Plan. <br /> <br />Aqe, Condition, and Overcrowdinq <br /> <br />Pleasanton is fortunate to have a relatively new housing stock. <br />Also, there are several hundred older buildings in the downtown <br />area which have been restored or well maintained. Only 660 units, <br />or 3% of the existing housing stock, were built prior to 1950. An <br />additional 22% of the existing stock was constructed between 1950 <br />and 1970 while 75% has been built in the past twenty years (Table <br />IV-3) . <br /> <br />The housing stock is in excellent condition as might be expected <br />with such newly built housing. As of 1980, only 41 units or .4% of <br />the total housing stock lacked complete individual plumbing <br />facilities and only 56 units lacked complete kitchen facilities. <br />The City's Building Department estimates that no more than 100 <br />units require major rehabilitation and no more than 10 require <br />replacement, city-wide. No units lacked adequate heating <br />equipment. With an average of 6.43 rooms per unit, very few <br />examples of overcrowding exist in Pleasanton. As of 1980, only 1% <br />or 122 units, 53 of which were renter occupied, contained more than <br />one resident per room. <br /> <br />Since 1986, the City has rehabilitated relatively few substandard <br />units. This is because of the allocation of most of the City's <br />housing-related resources to meeting housing needs through new <br />construction. At the same time, the City has lost only nine units <br />to demolition, all of which have been replaced with a greater <br />number of new units. In the short-term, housing condition is <br />unlikely to change significantly. However, in the next 15 or 20 <br />years, homes that were constructed in the 1950's may begin to <br />experience structural problems unless they are well maintained and, <br />in some cases, rehabilitated. The 660 units built prior to 1950 <br />will require increasing maintenance to avoid demolition in the <br />long-term. Most of the units with structural problems are located <br />in the downtown area which is targeted as a specific plan area to <br />address these and other issues. <br /> <br />Housing Element policies 13, 14, and 15 contain specific objectives <br />for maintaining and improving the condition of the City's existing <br />housing stock. <br /> <br />Population <br /> <br />Population growth closely parallels the development of housing. In <br />Pleasanton, population more than quadrupled during the 1960's, <br />doubled during the 1970's, and increased by more than 50% in the <br />1980's. Due to residential growth management and other factors, <br />population growth has slowed during the first half of the 1980's to <br /> <br />IV-5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.