Laserfiche WebLink
4y$~BA~~°y CITY of PLEASANTON <br />~~ .~;. <br />'~~~° Planning Commission <br />w ~o <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />Otte ; July 9, 1975 <br />Time : g ~ oo P . M. <br />PIGCe; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Res. No. 1359, <br />Accepted <br />Secretary Harris described the back- <br />ground of this application and his <br />reasons for denying it. <br />The applicant was not present. <br />'Commissioner Carrigan felt that if <br />it is going to be mail order and <br />.packaging will occur in the home, it <br />would be impossible for the City to <br />,control the. business or enforce the <br />',requirements for granting of a home <br />'occupation. Commissioner Shepherd <br />termed this a small scale manufactur- <br />ing business, and Commissioner Butler <br />felt that the staff made the right <br />decision. <br />A resolution recommending denial of <br />this appeal was entered and unani- <br />mously adopted. <br />Submission of the Pleasanton Rede- <br />velopment Plan for determination of <br />conformance with the General Plan. <br />esolution• <br />econded: •~X'. <br />yes: iX~! <br />oes <br />bsent: `~ <br />bstain: <br />p r <br />Chairman Wood felt the plan was very] <br />good, but was uncertain as to how they <br />mechanics of the plan were to be ~ <br />accomplished. He would recommend <br />that the existing bodies be so desig~~ <br />nated to accomplish this. <br />-6- <br />_... ... ,. ._. .._.....T......._........ ._~. ... __, _._._ , _,~. _... .. ,. _.__.... __...._. ......__. _... .~_.... <br />For the record, Secretary Harris con- <br />firmed receipt by Commissioners of <br />the draft EIR on the Redevelopment <br />Plan, stating that the comment per- <br />iod will end on July 31, Also, <br />draft resolution was passed out for <br />their review. Under the State <br />redevelopment law, the Commission <br />must find whether this plan is in <br />conformance with the General Plan. <br />In addition, they may comment on the <br />lan <br />X'. <br />