PC 03/10/82 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Richman indicated that he already knew this but did not know the status and that if staff is satisfied he has no problems with it. Mr. Richman referred to their entitlement to compensation concerning various improvements which benefit the Reynolds and Brown project. Commissioner Wilson indicated he didn't believe that the Commission could assess a monetary amount on behalf of the Meyer project against the Reynolds and Brown project. He stated that Meyer has other avenues for compensation i.e., court actions, etc. Mr. Richman stated he doesn't agree with this inasmuch as compensating conditions have been added to the Meyer project. He read condition number 69 of case PUD-80-16. He reviewed the conditions he suggested for the Reynolds and Brown project. Commissioner Jamieson asked if Reynolds and Brown has received copies of their proposal. Mr. Richman said no they have not and the last time the matter was discussed with Reynolds and Brown was April 1981 and the matter hasn't changed any and that Meyer Properties would like to have the problem resolved. Commissioner Jamieson asked if Reynolds and Brown have responded to their first proposal. Mr. Richman said they have not. Commissioner Wilson said perhaps the matter should be continued so the parties involved can resolve their differences. Chairperson Getty said this is what the Commission previously tried to get across to the applicants. She said Reynolds and Brown have to work on the Meyer road for their project to work. She said this points out the Commission's position and she thinks something should be done about it. Commissioner Wilson indicated that if the level of service reaches "E" the area won't be buildable. Mr. Swift said that traffic access point would be through Meyer's property and that is where the traffic signal was discussed and the purchase of Meyer's property in order to make building a road across the property possible. He said at that time there was no Meyer project. He said it was assumed the two projects would develop in the normal manner. Normally no compensation for streets is paid to the next door neighbors. Mr. Warnick said the developers are somewhat apart as to what they will pay for. He indicated a stronger condition could be put in or a meeting arranged for the developers to arrive at an agreement. Commissioner Wilson said if this type of difference is starting this early in the game, he foresees many problems with the assessment district. Mr. Warnick said the problem appears to be 'how much' will this payment be for the right-of-way. -12- _. _~__._~..._______ __.._____.._~.. _.. __.._..._.. _ _ . ._..._ _.._._,_ ___..., ... _. _. ._ -___._.._ _....T.__.