My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 05/19/82
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
PC 05/19/82
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:27:08 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 2:16:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/19/1982
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 05/19/82
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Callahan responded saying - as part of the Hopyard Road improvements, <br />they will be adding a soundwall in residential areas. He said they <br />don't have the design yet for the portion between the Mocho and Valley <br />Trails but that they are working on it. He said that under the PUD <br />conditions they are responsible for this mitigation. <br />Jay Raimondi: Said all truck traffic should use a frontage road and <br />the Hacienda interchange. <br />Mr. Harris stated that when the general plan amendments were put <br />together the City looked at all of the policy statements of the <br />General Plan which might need to be changed because of the Hacienda <br />PUD and if the plan is changed and to require Gibraltar and Hopyard <br />be used for all truck traffic, then a general plan amendment with <br />this regard would not be necessary. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />Commissioner Lindsey stated he is in favor of removing Item 4 from <br />the list of proposed General Plan changes (regarding truck traffic). <br />Commissioner Jamieson asked the Acting City Attorney to respond to <br />the comments the citizens raised with regard to an environmental <br />impact being required for General Plan changes. Mr. Swift stated <br />that if it is determined by the Planning Commission that there may <br />be any significant adverse impacts which cannot be mitigated as a <br />result of the proposed changes with regard to any of the physical <br />aspects, i.e., air, water, etc., an EIR would be required. <br />Commissioner Lindsey indicated that concerns were addressed in Volume <br />2 of the EIR. <br />Commissioner Jamieson asked who prepared the negative declarations for <br />the general plan amendment proposals? Mr. Swift responded that they <br />were done by the planning staff. Commission Jamieson asked if counsel <br />was consulted. Mr. Swift stated that all such projects require <br />environmental assessment but that it is the recommendation of the <br />planning staff that there would be no significant effects; the <br />Planning Commission, based on the Initial Study and any other <br />relevant evidence put forth at the hearing, must decide for themselves <br />if there may be any significant effect as this decision cannot be <br />delegated to staff. <br />Commissioner Lindsey indicated that the City has an opportunity to <br />have a nice business park over which the City has a significant amount <br />of control. He indicated the General Plan for the area has been for <br />this type of use for at least the last 15 years. He said he feels <br />the necessary studies have been done and he is for the project. He <br />said he is in favor of removing Item #4 of the general plan amend- <br />ments relating to truck traffic using Las Positas and Hopyard as <br />discussed earlier. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Lindsey, seconded by Commissioner <br />Wilson that on the basis of an Initial Study of the potential environ- <br />mental impacts of the project, the Planning Commission has determined <br />that some proposed changes (deleting the policy referring to a <br />prohibition of direct vehicular access to Hopyard Road from adjacent <br />-10- <br />__._.r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.