Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. 2195 was then entered and adopted recommending approval of <br />case UP-82-11 as motioned. <br />PUD-80-16-1M, City of Pleasanton <br />Application of the City of Pleasanton for modification of an <br />approved planned unit development (Ordinance No. 973) for an <br />approximately 82 acre site located northwest of Hopyard Road <br />and Stoneridge Drive to require that applications for design <br />review approval be presented before the City Council for review <br />and approval. <br />Mr. Harris stated this is the application of the City Council to <br />modify PUD-80-16 which was the planned unit development approval <br />of the Meyer Business Park. He stated the staff is recommending <br />this be amended by deleting Condition No. 2 of Ordinance No. 973 <br />which states that since only conceptual plans were being shown of <br />the buildings proposed for the park that all design plans and <br />site land uses would have to be submitted to the Design Review <br />Board for approval prior to any building permits being issued. <br />The Council requested this be amended to require that architectural <br />and site design be approved by the full Planning Commission instead <br />of the Design Review Board and that the Council have the final <br />approval. Mr. Harris stated this would then bring the conditions <br />into line with the conditions for Reynolds and Brown and Hacienda. <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />No one spoke. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Wilson, seconded by Commissioner <br />Jamieson, that case PUD-80-16-1M be approved as stated in the <br />staff report. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />Ayes: Commissioners Doherty, Getty, Jamieson, Wilson and <br />Chairperson Lindsey <br />Noes: None <br />Absent: None <br />Abstain: None <br />Resolution No. 2196 was then entered and adopted recommending <br />approval of case PUD-80-16-1M as motioned. <br />- 3- <br />