Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Wilson then asked about the petitions presented to <br />Council. Mr. Schneider said there was a petition of 36 names <br />against the project submitted to City Council previously. He said <br />there were only 36 names on it because of the limited time they <br />had in which to get signatures. <br />Sue Glanville, 3069 Chardonnay, spoke to concerns with increased <br />density of the area and traffic problems which relate to it. She <br />said the location is not good for transportation of seniors and others. <br />She said there is no place for children to play. She said as far <br />as the Vintage Hills Homeowners Association is concerned she has no <br />idea how many people are members of this association. She said <br />she is also concerned with real estate devaluation of surrounding <br />homes should this development go through. <br />Carol Hall again spoke stating there are planty of places with more <br />and better access than this location. Commissioner Doherty indicated. <br />that a project is being built right behind the Safeway store on <br />Santa Rita Road. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />Commissioner Wilson asked what the State law is concerning this type <br />of development. Mr. Swift responded that one cannot discriminate <br />against manufactured housing. He said this project must be looked <br />at based upon its merits, ie. lot layout, streets, easements, water <br />lines, etc. but not judged on its basis of manufactured housing. <br />Commissioner Wilson then asked about No. 15 of the negative declara- <br />tion relating to public controversy and the fact that it is checked <br />"No". Mr. Harris said the negative declaration was prepared prior <br />to this meeting and at that time as far as the staff knew, there <br />was no great amount of public controversy. Commissioner Wilson <br />indicated that sometimes petitions are somewhat vague in saying <br />what the citizens are opposed to. Commissioner Doherty agreed with <br />this statement. <br />Commissioner Doherty stated he has been in favor of this project <br />all along. He said that the project may be a little dense but that <br />this could be taken care of in the final decision. <br />Commissioner Getty stated that basically she goes along with <br />Commissioner Doherty's statements. <br />Commissioner Wilson said these homes will be on a concrete foundation <br />but not what one would think of as concrete foundations. He spoke <br />to concerns with redwood planking and that in 10 years it will be <br />deteriorated. He said for these reasons he feels the homeowners <br />association should be responsible for them. He said in all fairness <br />the applicant has addressed previous concerns by the City but he <br />feels that the project is too dense. He .said that perhaps the <br />recreation area should be increased in size since there are no parks <br />in the area. He asked if units 71 through 142 were duplexes. Mr. <br />Earp, the developer, responded that they are duplexes. Commissioner <br />-19- <br />