PC 10/13/82 - Laserfiche WebLink

PUD-82-21, Ken Earp et al (Refer to PUD-82-20) Application of Ken Earp, et al for Planned Unit Development (PUD) development plan approval for an approximately 244 unit manufactured housing project for an approximately 29 acre site located on the north side of Vineyard Avenue opposite Sauterne Way. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Medium Density Residential District. The Planning Commission may recommend any action regarding this matter consistent with the General Plan. A negative declaration of environmental impacts will also be considered. Mr. Harris summarized the staff report and stated that this project has been before the Planning Commission previously and was recommended for approval. He said it was denied by City Council twice but subsequently won a second Affordable Housing competition. The public hearing was opened. Vice Chairperson Jamieson asked if the people who spoke on case PUD-82-20, Harris Realty and Mildred Vallarino, would not be redundant in their testimony concerning Vineyard Avenue traffic. Commissioner Wilson indicated he thought all persons should be heard again. Mr. Swift stated that the speakers could identify themselves and then state they have the same concerns for this project that were expressed in case PUD-82-20 and this would make it a matter of record without duplicating what has already been said. The public hearing was opened. Frank Sieglietz, attorney for the developer spoke. He said they are in support of substantially all of the conditions imposed by staff and asked to submit his written understanding concerning several of the conditions as follows: 18. That 6" vertical concrete curbs be installed between all paved and common landscaped areas, except for the curbs in front of the dwelling units. 23. That lighting approved by the Police Department shall be provided around the perimeters of all buildings, except the dwelling units, on the subject property. 28. That the City of Pleasanton has designated the Quail Creek Project as a winner of the Affordable Housing Competition and has thereby assured that the Quail Creek Project is eligible for all the benefits set forth in Resolution No. 81-287, including an exemption from the existing growth management limitation, guaranteed sewer capacity, and "fast tracking" through City review processes. 30. That the developer pay any and all fees to which the property may be subject, consistent with the terms of the affordable housing competition resolution. -15-