Laserfiche WebLink
Next, Larry Billings, 2 3 Chardonnay, local businE <br />personal axe to grind. He sincerely hoped that the <br />has given this proposed ordinance much thought. He <br />regulations are imposed on private enterprise, comp <br />There being no further public testimony, the Public <br />to the September 14., 1977, meeting. <br />Commissioner Jamieson arrived at 8:52 P.M. <br />Oman, stated he had no <br />Planning Commission <br />felt that when such <br />=tition is hampered. <br />Hearing was continued <br />City Attorney Ken Scheidig indicated that in the process of preparing this <br />ordinance, it was recognized that the City might be sued, and that they <br />recognize its obligation to meet imposed standards pertaining to air quality. <br />He then provided the Commissioners and the audience with an explanage°also <br />the LAVWMA pipeline project, as well as the 1972 sewer agreement. <br />stated that the Sunol treatment plant has had a cease and desist order on <br />it almost continuously since April, 1973, until March of 1976. <br />Hopefully, if everything goes as planned, the LAVWMA pipeline will be <br />completed in March, 1980. Funding will be provided up to 87z~ through <br />Federal and State aid. This aid would be given with the understanding <br />that for the first five years of the program, the City could not build <br />faster than the E/O growth rate. The ordinance speaks to the 1972 settle- <br />ment agreement on Page 2 under 2-13.02 (d) and again on Page 5, Sec. <br />2-13.07(a) (3) and Page 6, Sec. 2-13.07 (b) (2). The question is whether <br />the 1972 settlement agreement is such an overriding, binding agreement <br />as to not be subject to a plan as proposed. Mr. Scheidig recommended <br />that the Planning Commission read over the City Attorney's report on the <br />Legal Analysis of the Growth Management Plan prepared on November 12, 1976. <br />He emphasized that the City did not give away all its powers with the <br />settlement agreement. He then gave further explanation regarding Paragraph <br />eight of Exhibit B of that agreement. He emphasized that there is <br />flexibility in the Residential Allocation Program. He agreed with Mr. <br />Pearson's comments that if the Planning Commission exempts certain <br />developments from the Plan, the City may as well drop the entire plan. <br />Staff conceded that changes would be made on the plan as they work with <br />it. <br />Commissioner Jamieson requested, and received from the City Attorney, an <br />explanation regarding how often swapping of permits has occurred. <br />Chairman Butler then stated that at the next meeting on September 14, <br />1977, the Planning Commission should expect to work on the ordinance again <br />and enter into discussion on how to implement the ordinance. <br />Secretary Harris told thn Cwo ldsbenthe ordinancetanddthemelementr tStaff <br />review at the next hears g <br />would anticipate at least one more meeting before the Planning Commission <br />makes a decision. A recommenaaementwCommitteebmayaor maytnotCmeetCodepending <br />Prior to that, the Growth Ma g <br />on the changes, if any, proposed by the Planning Commission. If necessary, <br />they will meet and make a separate recommendation to the City Council. <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />The special meets g of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 9:11 P.M. <br />Robert J. Harris Secretary <br />-3- <br />_1 __.. .. _ _. ~..._ .. <br />