My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 06/14/78
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
PC 06/14/78
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2017 9:18:47 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 11:20:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/14/1978
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 06/14/78
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A motion was entered and adopted recommending to the City Council the <br />five-year capital improvement program covering the period 1978-83. <br />Roll Call Vote <br />Motion: Wilson <br />Seconded: Doherty <br />Ayes: Doherty, Leppert, <br />Noes: None <br />Getty, Wilson, Jamieson <br />MATTERS FOR COMP•4ISSION'S INFORMATION <br />A. City Attorney Levine indicated that in response to Commissioner Getty's <br />request that attempts be made to contact the property owner of the property <br />adjacent to the Vets Building at Main and Bernal, to request clean up of <br />the lot, Mayor Pdercer sent a letter to the property owner, Anna Larsen. <br />To date, no answer has been received. <br />MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMIBSION MEMBERS <br />A. Chairman Jamieson commented on the number of trucks illegally parked <br />in the City. City Attorney Levine replied that the City Manager is preparing <br />a report addressing this problem. <br />B. Chairman Jamieson observed certain subdivision signs for Creeksbend in <br />the City and asked if they were legal. Secretary Harris answered that they <br />were not but that staff is dealing with it. <br />C. Commissioner Getty requested that an ordinance amendment to consider <br />off-site advertising signs for commercial industrial development be scheduled <br />for review. <br />D. Commissioner Wilson commented regarding the manner in which the review <br />of the design plans for The Sunshine Saloon occurred. He felt it was a <br />difficult way for the Commissioners to consider an application. He felt <br />some kind of recommendation should be submitted by staff. Secretary Harris <br />stated that his preference would have been to not consider such matters and <br />have such applications be properly scheduled for the next regular meeting. <br />E. Commissioner Doherty advised that he would not be present for the next <br />Board of Adjustment meeting, and possibly not make the Planning Commission <br />meeting that evening. Chairman Jamieson appointed Commissioner Wilson to <br />serve on the Board of Adjustment as a substitute. <br />F. Secretary Harris advised the Commissioners that with passage of Proposi- <br />tion 13, it's very possible that staff would be cut. Understandably, the <br />manner in which workloads would be distributed may be changed considerably. <br />However, no firm answers can be given at this time until final arrange- <br />ments have been made. Some discussion ensued regarding how cuts in staff <br />and Planning Commission time could be effectuated. <br />• c. <br />ADJOURNMENT - the regular meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at <br />10:30 P Z <br />~' <br />Robert J. arras, Secretary <br />-3- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.