My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 03/12/80
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
PC 03/12/80
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:10:13 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 9:59:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/12/1980
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 03/12/80
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Doherty asked Mr. Harris to address the model view easement. <br />Mr. Harris stated that the Planning Commission has to approve Conceptual <br />Elevations prior to approval of the final subdivision map; that the <br />applicant has to submit a house siting plan prior to final approval <br />and that siting plan indicate whether or not the buildings will be one <br />or two story houses. He stated that these items can be considered <br />at a public hearing if the Commission elects to do so. <br />Chairperson Doherty inquired as to whether or not this was clear to all <br />of the speakers. <br />Mrs. Severin stated they have concerns with the actual heights of the <br />proposed houses vs. the existing homes. <br />Chairperson Doherty stated that these items will be heard at a public <br />hearing. <br />Arnold Abrott, 4537 Mirador Drive spoke stating he had concerns with <br />Lot #9 which was directly behind his house. He stated the pad is <br />440 and 437 ft. and that his home is 449 ft. and there will be a <br />problem. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />Commissioner Getty addressed the Commission concerning a solar condi- <br />tion she would like to see imposed on this project. Commissioner <br />Jamieson stated he supports solar but doesn't believe it would be proper <br />to impose it on the developer at this late date. Commissioner Getty <br />stated that most of the proposals heard tonight would have adequate <br />lot size to consider solar energy. <br />Commissioner Wilson did not support a condition being added to the ten- <br />tative maps being heard at this meeting. <br />Bob Douglass, M & M Consultants, engineers for Centex asked to address <br />the Commission. He stated that with the setback requirements and other <br />requirements of the development as conditions of approval, they could <br />not re-orient the houses to accommodate a solar condition at this late <br />date, but did agree solar should be considered in future planning. <br />Mr. Harris stated that state law now addresses the use of solar oriented <br />conditions when considering subdivisions, etc. <br />Commissioner Wilson made a motion which was seconded by Commissioner <br />Jamieson that Tract .4539 be approved subject to the conditions of the <br />staff report. <br />-8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.