My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 05/14/80
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
PC 05/14/80
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:10:27 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 9:55:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/14/1980
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 05/14/80
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Harris explained the staff report. He addressed the fact that since <br />this is a new project, every effort should be made to take advantage of <br />solar energy. He further stated that since the general plan has a <br />goal of 13$ lower income; that if Mr. Oakes would make 6 units available <br />for this purpose he would be entitled to bonus lots. <br />Commissioner Getty addressed a rendering shown to the Commissioners <br />and stated she felt it to be out of proportion. She asked Mr. Schaumburg <br />if we had any other developments where the cabana club is in the middle <br />of an area and next to the street. <br />Mr. Schaumburg stated there were other similar areas in the City. <br />Commissioner Getty stated that the cars depicted on the rendering must <br />be small and that in reality there is barely room for two cars. <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />George Oakes, 31123 Mission Drive (the applicant) addressed the Com- <br />mission. He stated he thought the number of units on this project had <br />been worked out with the Planning Director and that he doesn't agree <br />private developers should get into the social engineering aspect of the <br />community (6 units reduced in price). He stated this should be handled <br />by the welfare administrators at a state or federal level. He stated <br />that previously he had offered property to Shapell for low/moderate <br />income housing. He then stated that Mrs. Hughart will speak to the <br />solar aspects of the development. Mr. Oakes stated that the only <br />way to make the entire complex solar energy efficient would be to make <br />small lanes with a driveway so that all of them will be facing an <br />east/west direction. He further stated he had no objection to 48 in. <br />fences as he plans to go 5 ft. with regard to the cabana area. He <br />stated that regarding condition #32 he would prefer to eliminate <br />units as opposed to offering houses at a reduced price. <br />Mrs. Hughart, Longview Drive, solar specialist addressed the solar <br />aspects of the proposed project. She passed out literature showing <br />state requirements vs what Mr. Oakes proposes to do. She explained <br />in detail passive/active solar concepts. <br />Commissioner Jamieson asked many questions concerning solar energy <br />and Mrs. Hughart answered them all in detail. <br />Commissioner Jamieson stated that there are three buildings east/west <br />orientated and that it would appear one or two might be able to be <br />reoriented to take advantage of passive solar energy without upsetting <br />the design of the complex. Mr. Oakes stated his plan is not cast in <br />stone and modifications can be made. <br />-10- <br />_. _ _ . _ ._. _~ ...,..._.. , _ _ . _.._. _.. _ . _. _ _ _ r _. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.