Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Burkhardt then introduced David Capron of Daon. He described the <br />uses anticipated. Mr. Lynn McVickar, Pacific Urban Design was also <br />introduced as the architect for the development. <br />Bill Christenson, 7979 Hillsboro, President of the Stoneridge Homeowners <br />Association, spoke concerning Items 1, 2 and 3 of the recommendations. <br />He asked what lands have been put aside for the cloverleaf for the inter- <br />change. Mr. Capron said the upper right-hand corner would fit within <br />that area as no buildings have been planned for this portion of the site. <br />He further said that this area is not a proper one for affordable housing <br />and asked that the residential section be entirely eliminated from the <br />Stoneson parcel. <br />Commissioner Doherty asked for a definition of affordable housing. <br />Mr. Christenson said that they are talking about $60,000 for 600/800 <br />sq. ft. residences. <br />Dick Wenzel of BART spoke. He stated he concurs with the staff recom- <br />mendation concerning Item No. 20 and asked that it be deleted from <br />recommendation of approval. He explained requests have been made for <br />grant funds for the current alignment as shown on the General Plan <br />and did not want the funds jeopardized if at all possible with the <br />proposed change. He said the BART location on the east side of the <br />Mall currently floats and is not a fixed site per se. <br />Commissioner Doherty asked if realistically we would have BART in the <br />area by the year 2000. He asked that BART keep in mind that a station <br />might not even go in the area. <br />Mr. Allen, Vice President, BART, addressed the Commission. He said that <br />the citizens of Livermore and Pleasanton voted 80~ in favor of having <br />BART extended to the area. <br />Bruce Bird, 3538 Dickens Court, asked about the Prudential land and <br />proposal. <br />Mr. Harris explained that the uses wouldn't be any different than they <br />are now but it would allow the developer more flexibility in where he <br />places the uses on the property. <br />Yvan Albert of the General Plan Review Committee spoke. He said he <br />was perplexed by the outcome of their recommendations concerning the <br />percentage of multiples to single-family residential. He said it was <br />not the intent of the Committee to change the 25/75$ multiple to single- <br />family residential but to achieve it. <br />-6- <br />_._ _. _ _ _ _ . _. .t..,__...._.. _ ... ~ .. __„ _ .. _, _ ._ _ __ _T.. , ___ . <br />