PC 09/16/81 - Laserfiche WebLink

A motion was then made by Commissioner Jamieson, seconded by Commissioner Lindsey that the property described in RZ-81-16 be prezoned as follows: the school site "P" (Public and Institutional) District; and the balance of the property shown in this application be prezoned PUD-Low Density Residential District. ROLL CALL VOTE Ayes: Commissioners Doherty, Jamieson, Lindsey and Chairperson Getty Noes: None Absent: Commissioner Wilson Resolution No. 2067 was then entered and adopted for RZ-81-16 as motioned. RZ-81-17, City of Pleasanton App ication o t e City of Pleasanton to prezone (Annexation No. 91) an approximately 35 acre site located on the west side of Martin Avenue at its intersection of Mohr Avenue to any zoning district consistent with the General Plan. A negative declaration of environmental impacts will also be considered. This matter was continued to October 14, 1981 so that tYie matter could be readvertised showing the 35 acre site to be located on the west side of Martin Avenue. PUD-81-20, Breilh Homes, Inc. Application of Breilh Homes, Inc. for Plannned Unit Development (PUD- High Density Residential) zoning and development plan approval for a 32 unit townhouse condominium project to be located on their 2± acre site on the south side of Palomino Drive between Pico Avenue and Concord Street. The property is zoned "O" (Office) District. A negative declaration of environmental impacts was also considered. Mr. Harris explained the staff report and concerns with density. The public hearing was opened. Ed Breilh, Breilh Homes, Inc. made a presentation in support of his application stating that they would like his project to qualify for the municipal bond project. He introduced his architect. Al English, Architect, 1266 San Pablo Avenue, Richmond, reviewed the proposed distances between buildings, the use of arbors, etc. in the project. He said that the property is a difficult one to work with and that there is a large easement through it. Ron Kane, 3679 Canelli Court, asked to see the plan. He said that his main concern was the creek bed area and that the creek has an underground 40 in. concrete tube which cuts across the property. Commissioner Jamieson asked what the plans are for the creek? Mr. Harris stated that there are no plans for Breilh to do anything with the creek. Mr. Kane said he was also concerned with erosion. Mr. Warnick reported that the final grading plans must be approved by the City engineers. He further stated that the developer is not responsible for the creek as long as he does nothing to disrupt the flow.