PC 03/09/83 - Laserfiche WebLink

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION 3/9/83 Page 8 Commissioner Doherty asked what would happen if an overall plan was not received for 10 years. Mr. Weimken said he thought they were told that a PUD was the best way to go and the area could be controlled best under this zoning. Commissioner Wilson pointed out that this application is a PUD but that Condition No. 2 proposed no development on the 3.8 acre site until a PUD development plan has come in. Mr. Harris reiterated that what Mr. Black is doing is contrary to the statement made by City Council, but nothing illegal has been done. Ne further indicated that staff was concerned with the precedent setting effect of this application, but that the staff must accept applications. submitted from the .property owners. As to its precedent setting that would be for the Planning Commission and City Council to decide. Mr. Weimken indicated he would hate for the lot split proposal requested by Mr. Black to be a loop hole used by others. Sob Combs, 3730 Camron Drive, was .concerned that if Mr. Black is allowed his proposal the other five or six property owners would request the same thing. Commissioner Wilson asked Mr. Combs if there were. six-eight people who would be applying for this same type of applications because they want to sell their homes. Mr. Combs said they could if they decided to. Commissioner Getty said that approval of this application would not effect the neighborhood. Mr. Combs said if this is approved, he would be able to do the same thing.. t3i11 Skinner, 3715 Mohr Avenue said he owns the five acres next to the Black property. Three weeks ago he had a real estate agent come to Mr. Harris to discuss his property and at that time was told there was to be an overall plan for the entire 35 acres. He stated he was further told up to last week that staff was considering recommending denial of Black's proposal but then didn't. Commissioner Wilson stated that sometimes legal counsel is sought and advice given to staff. Commissioner Wilson asked about the zoning of the property. Mr. Harris stated that the discussion has generally been a minimum lot size of 20,000-30,000 sq. ft. but that this was not added to the zoning as a condition. Mr. Harris stated that when the Black application City offices by Mr. Barbee, the same comments wer made to the representatives of Skinner, i.e., the have an overall plan for the entire 35 acres, but refuse to receive applications of property owners Mr. Black's application was presented with cogent was brought into the e made to him as those City Council desires to that the City cannot .and that in receiving reasons for the application, -8-