Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />5/25/83 <br />Page 11 <br />Mr. Gooch indicated he was satisfied with the conditions imposed <br />on the project with the exception of condition 31. The property <br />to be dedicated is 850 ft. away from his project and would therefore <br />have to be dedicated by Mrs. Johnson. Mrs. Johnson has firmly <br />indicated she did not want to do this. <br />There was then discussion regarding the necessity o.f this pump <br />station and why it was located at this snot. Staff indicated <br />the pump station was being built by The Chamberlain Group as <br />a condition of their RAF approval and it was placed at this <br />location according to hydrologic studies to improve water pressure <br />in this area. <br />There was then some discussion regarding the condition requiring <br />an access road to the park. <br />Mr. Gil Barbee, Land Surveyor, of 147 Bernal Avenue, spoke to <br />the Commission regarding; condition 31. In reviewing; the site <br />plan, he felt the. City had plenty of room to nark its vehicles <br />at the station. He also indicated that Mr. Dunkley had been paid <br />for the land necessary for the pump station in his development <br />and Mrs. Johnson also wanted to be paid. <br />Commissioner Doherty asked what logic staff was using to nay <br />Mr. Dunkley for his property and then try to have Mrs. Johnson <br />dedicate her property: Mr. Swift responded it was a matter of <br />timing. That when the Dunkley property was approved, staff <br />imposed many conditions. It was later determined to install a <br />pump station and at that time city could not demand dedication. <br />In this instance, we are dealing with the requirement at the <br />outset and it is not out of line to require the developer to <br />dedicate the property. <br />Commissioner Wilson asked staff if they agreed with TZr. Barbee's <br />claim that there was plenty of room for narking. Mr. Okamura <br />responded that there was not as much room as stated since plans <br />are being prepared for an 8 ft, wide bike lane in that area. <br />Marie Grant, 597 Rowell Lane, indicated she was not opposed to <br />the project and requested that the park access be retained in <br />the plans.. <br />Mr. Carl tilalter indicated he had spoken to a few people and they <br />did not want the easement for access to the nark. He felt the <br />one at Girard Court was adequate. <br />Mr. Peter Foy, also objected to the nark access easement. <br />The public hearing was then closed. <br />r <br />