Laserfiche WebLink
Page 6 <br />Minutes <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />8/24/83 <br />Fred Eichert, 7519 Ivy Court, asked the Commission give this <br />particular group all of the consideration they can as they have <br />had nothing but problems with their homes and the developer. <br />He asked Mr. Harris why he stated that apartments would be preferable <br />for the property vs. single-family. Mr. Harris stated he didn't <br />feel that single-family units would sell in such a location. <br />Mr. Eichert suggested the property be used for a storage area. <br />Mr. Harris stated that Mr. Schumacher talked about it at one <br />time but never submitted plans. He felt it wasn't an attractive <br />use. Mr. Johnson summarized his concerns and told the Commission <br />that the residents of their units are now in litigation with <br />Stoneson. He asked for all of the support of the staff and Commission <br />that they could get. <br />Commissioner Lindsey stsated that one of the speakers had indicated <br />the area is congested at this time. He asked if they would oppose <br />a medium density residential project if it came in. Mr. Johnson <br />stated that generally they could live with 60 rather than 140 <br />units. <br />John Statton, 5366 Brookside, felt that Stoneson glossed over <br />the plans for the surrounding property. He stated that the traffic <br />is not bad now in the area, but if the density is increased it <br />would most certainly be congested. <br />Chairman Jamieson then asked staff about notification regarding <br />this property. Mr. Swift stated it appears part of the file <br />concerning the notification is missing. He stated that a list <br />was made up at the general plan stage, something was lost, and <br />the list was used for the rezoning stage. He stated there is <br />no way of knowing who was notified with part of the list missing. <br />Chairman Wilson talked about the LOS of the intersection as now <br />being A going to LOS F with development. He stated this would <br />not just be the result of a devleopment of the 6.5 acres now <br />under discussion but will be as a result of development of 22 <br />other projects. <br />Commissioner Lindsey talked about the traffic study and had real <br />concerns with a residential neighborhood having one-way streets <br />in the future. Chairman Wilson felt that perhaps they should <br />be concerned with the other '22 developments. <br />Commissioner Doherty stated that from the traffic study it would <br />appear it will make no difference whether the subject property <br />is developed high or medium density residential withnegard to <br />effect on traffic concerns. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br /> <br />