My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 09/14/83
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
PC 09/14/83
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 10:24:32 AM
Creation date
4/27/2007 4:18:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/14/1983
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 09/14/83
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />September 14, 1983 <br />Page 10 <br />Commissioner Lindsey felt the developers had made an attempt <br />to follow the original concept. He stated this is an attractive <br />development and he, personally, liked the design of the structures. <br />Commissioner Doherty stated that perhaps the Planning Commission <br />is spoiled with elaborate presentations, but one could hardly <br />read the information on the plans. He stated there were no <br />color renderings nor models presented for the Commission and <br />audience to look at. He said this is a first-class project <br />and should have a first-class presentation. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Getty, seconded by Commissioner <br />Doherty to recommend approval of case PUD-80-16-1D, subject <br />to the conditions shown on the staff report of 9/14/83. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Doherty, Getty, Lindsey <br />and Wilson <br />NOES: Chairman Jamieson <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Resolution No. 2353 was entered and adopted recommending approval <br />of case PUD-80-16-1D as motioned. <br />Commissioner Lindsey reiterated concerns about the plans and <br />presentation. Mr. Harris stated clarity of plans is always <br />a problem - if you get large plans, they won't fit into the <br />packet and files and when you get small ones sometimes they <br />are difficult to read. Commissioner Lindsey stated the small <br />ones are fine for the packet but would like to see large plans <br />displayed. Chairman Jamieson disagreed with Commissioner <br />Lindsey on this. Mr. Harris stated the staff can require full <br />scale plans if the Commission so desires. <br />Proposed Newspaper Dispenser Ordinance <br />Assistant City Attorney, Brian Swift, presented the staff <br />report and recommendtions. <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />Nel Martin, The Valley Times, 126 Spring Street, spoke. She <br />stated she has been out of town the last three days but they <br />have worked very closely with staff and feel this is an ordinance <br />they can live with. He said they will do their best to cooperate. <br />Judy Mayhew, President of the Downtown Association, spoke <br />in favor of the proposed ordinance. She inquired about various <br />sections of the proposed ordinance and Mr. Swift explained. <br />Commissioner Getty then stated the only four legged intersection <br />in the core area is at Rose/Neal/Main Street. Mr. Swift said <br />this location must not be too good because theere are no modules <br />at this location now. <br />_~ ..__. __ ._.___ -10 - <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.