My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 12/12/84
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
PC 12/12/84
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 10:28:28 AM
Creation date
4/26/2007 5:02:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/12/1984
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 12/12/84
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes <br />Planning Commission <br />12/12/84 <br />Chris Kinzel, TJKM, addressed the driveway and traffic of the <br />area. The rendering presented is a revision which shows the <br />right turn lane beginning at a different point. <br />Chairman Doherty indicated that there is a parking problem at <br />some of the sites in the area <br />Commissioner Innes asked Mr. Hogue if the R&D included <br />warehousing. Mr.Hogue responded that it is a prototype. <br />Commissioner Innes asked what would happen if Koll doesn't get <br />the typical R&D people. <br />Commissioner Innes felt more parking should be provided. <br />John Steinbuch, 635 Abbie Street, broke for CPS, indicated a need <br />for this type of leasing space in the Valley. He reviewed Devcon <br />and Valley Business Park. Office buildings are standing vacant <br />while this type of area is rented right away. <br />Commissioner Innes then asked Mr. Swift about enforcement of <br />CC&Rs. Mr. Swift explained that unless a particular provision is <br />incorporated in the PUD, the City can't necessarily enforce the <br />CC&Rs. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Lindsey, seconded by <br />Commissioner Getty that PUD-81-30-25D be recommended for approval <br />inasmuch as it is a first-class project subject to the five staff <br />conditions, eliminating "A" in Condition No. 2. <br />Commissioner Innes said the building is way too long. He felt <br />the project should be redesigned and divided into two. He felt <br />the parking should be increased. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Getty, Lindsey, Wilson and Chairman Doherty <br />NOES: Commissioner Innes <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN:None <br />Resolution No. 2587 was entered and adopted recommending approval <br />of case PUD-81-30-25D as motioned <br />RZ-84-19, City of Pleasanton <br />Application of the City of Pleasanton to amend the provisions of <br />Article 3, Chapter 2, Title II of the Ordinance Code to require <br />rear and side yard fencing in single-family residential <br />districts. <br />This item was with drawn. <br />- 23 - <br />_._.. _. <br />T---- . _..... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.