Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes <br />Planning Commission. <br />11/14/84 <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br />Commissioner <br />Wellman and <br />None <br />Commissioner <br />None <br />Getty, Innes, Lindsey <br />Chairman Doherty <br />Wilson <br />PUD-84-13 Castlewood Pro ertiesp Inc. / rezone an <br />Application of of Castlewood Pro ertplannedcUnit p <br />approximately 8.8 acre site to PUD ( p, ricultural) <br />Development)-High Density Residential and "A" ( g <br />Districts and for development plan approval for an 84 unit <br />multi-family residential complex and proposed City park on the <br />site located on the east side of Bernal ACommissionemayTtake any <br />Drive and Vineyard Avenue. The Planning <br />action on this application consistent with the GeneactsPwill also <br />mitigated negative declaration of environmental imp <br />be considered. <br />resented the staff report. He reviewed the proposed <br />Mr. Harris p ect relates to traffic <br />mitigated negative declaration as the prof <br />impacts. <br />Commissioner Lindsey asked about the extension of Valley Avenue <br />to Bernal Avenue. Mr. Warni5o concerningtthe crossingoandill be <br />made probably in a month or <br />whether or not it should destrict wound havertoebeeformeddfor <br />crossing. An assessment <br />approximately $4-5,000,000. <br />Commissioner Innes askedwouldhhavenao benprepared1ngMro Harrpsncy <br />were removed, if an EIR <br />stated it is the staff's position that since the City has <br />established LOS "E" as unacceptable, an EIR would have to be <br />required. If on the otherheaCommissionecouldafindlthatval of <br />service will not happen, t ated negative declaration <br />negative declaration rather than mitig <br />is in order. <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />205-F Main Street, presented the project indicating <br />Art Dunkley, on it since late summer of 1983 when <br />that they have been working have met with the Park and <br />the property became available. They eo le who want a <br />Recreation staff, Commission and all of the p P <br />park on the site. They have meA~~witThehGeneralwPlan was changede <br />they prefer the proposed Plan ark. All vehicle <br />to accommodate high density residential and p <br />access would be from VineyarHeAstatedtthatePlantD.isUrecommendede <br />and two bedroom (50o each). <br />for approval by the Park and Recreation Commission. They are <br />roviding six more parking places than shown in the staff report. <br />p ~ aved way going north toward Vineyard <br />He addressed the 25 p The applicants do not <br />Avenue. Plan B shows no access through. <br />have real strong feelings about this matter one way or the other. <br />- 7 - <br />..~ <br />