Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes <br />Planning Commissioi <br />11/14/84 <br />Mr. Harris indicated that staff has analyzed this proposal and <br />came to the conclusion that no addeS~oWeretapproved uld be <br />generated if Mr. Wasserteil's req <br />Commissioner Lindsey felt t5erteilwindacatednthatsthere are5 <br />change is allowed. Mr• Was average 45 people in the <br />usually four players per court and they <br />aerobics area and this would leave 60 people who could use this <br />space. He felt the area woTedcbrrentlyeservingn45 peoplerfor Mr. <br />Wasserteil indicated they a eo le which is the <br />aerobics and the use would increase about 16 p P <br />amount of people who currently can use the racquetball couand.are <br />They have done this in their South San Francisco facility <br />sure of the numbers. <br />Mr. Wasserteil explained the location of thexisting'spaceer room. <br />gy building a staircase it would be taking <br />downstairs out °womensulocker areahwouldtbelused.thTheyeare <br />upstairs in the <br />trying to relieve crowded facilitihavennoadesi~e totc~eatenana <br />new use for the open space. They in to <br />overcrowded condition - this is what they are try g <br />eliminate. <br />Commissioner Getty concurred Shehfeltmstickers fordauto windows <br />the use would be increased. <br />should be provided for the me~herentireeconcepthofsthefclubeisrds <br />should be researched because roved. <br />being changed from what was app <br />Commissioner Lindsey asked how the number of people could be <br />controlled. Mr. Harris acknowledged that it would be diWithuthe <br />to do. Mr. Wasserteil offnewd lans for expansionoandnwould not <br />City to come back in with p eo le than allowed. <br />wish to jeopardize this and have more p P <br />Commissioner Lindsey couldn't support Mr. Wasserteil's proposal <br />because he felt it would increase traffic. <br />Commissioner Innes felt that the existing use would not be <br />changed in that the physical size of the premises is not being <br />inion. <br />changed. He asked Mr. Swift's op <br />Mr. Swift indicated he would hotethe City couldrprohibitothislons <br />before him to see whether or n it is possible <br />proposal. Ifnotnbetable toudenyotheeproposeddinternal <br />the City may <br />reconfiguration. <br />It was then decided that thesconditionse foproject approvalber <br />2g, 1984 for research of th <br />REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA <br />Mr. Harris indicated that PansurOestedstha~uUPt84-55sshouDd84-17 <br />be continued to 11/28/84 an gg <br />- 2 - <br />