Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />June 27, 1984 <br />Page 9 <br />Commissioner Wilson felt that by mixing the conditional use permit application and the <br />prior development, it would be comparing or mixing apples and oranges. <br />Mr. Swift reiterated the findings required to be made for granting this conditional use permit. <br />If they findings can be made, then the use permit should be granted. Mr. Swift defined <br />the findings. <br />Chairman Doherty indicated that the type of application before the Commission is a request <br />for a conditional use permit for the operation of a model home complex for a limited period <br />of time and is the type of request which can be legally made. Chairman Doherty read <br />the findings from the staff report as follows: <br />A. That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of <br />the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. <br />B. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it <br />would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, <br />or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. <br />C. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions <br />of the Zoning Ordinance. <br />The Chairman indicated he is extremely sympathetic to the problems of the area, but that <br />the proper agencies to handle the concerns expressed are the licensing board, consumer <br />affairs and the courts. It appears that the proper steps have been taken for resolution. <br />Personally he could not find a reason based on the rules governing the Planning Commission <br />to deny the particular application for a conditional use permit. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Wilson, seconded by Commissioner Innes (motionand <br />second made most reluctantly they stated), that findings as shown above are made and that <br />case UP-84-27 be approved subject to the conditions shown on the staff report. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Innes, Wilson and Chairman Doherty <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Resolution No. 2490 was entered and adopted approving case UP-84-27 as motioned. The <br />audience was advised there is a 15 day appeal period. <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />There Being no further business the Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 6:35pm <br />by Chairman Gregg Doherty. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Robert J. Harris, <br />Secretary <br />