My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
050107
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2007 3:31:07 PM
Creation date
4/26/2007 3:31:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/1/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Agency agreed that this is a package deal and that all of these projects need to be on the <br />table, as well as Caltrans. She noted there was also a member of the California <br />Transportation Commission at the meeting who also agreed. <br />Councilmember McGovern stated she was disappointed in the vote and how the process <br />came about and finished out. She indicated she felt they were looking for a level of <br />consensus. She noted all of them were agreeing on these projects and the sequencing, <br />because they would be seeking State and Federal funding. If you look at Isabel and the <br />interchange that will be built; why you would put so much money into an interchange and <br />not improve State Route 84. She commented further on their request to get a <br />commitment regarding the extension of Stoneridge Drive and added she does not feel that <br />is within the scope of the Study. She noted what she would like to see happen is that they <br />find a way to come back together to see if there is a way to try to reach consensus. <br />Councilmember Cook-Kallio commented that the Stoneridge extension is still in the <br />General Plan and she would not like to think that people are trying to impact the Planning <br />Commission and joint City Council workshop on how that will be approached in the future. <br />City Council discussion ensued regarding State Route 84 and the request to extend <br />Stoneridge Drive. Discussion regarding how the order of the projects was established <br />took place as well as discussion regarding funding and safety issues. <br />Mayor Hosterman opened the item for public comment. <br />John Carroll addressed the City Council and thanked Mayor Hosterman and <br />Councilmember McGovern for participating in the Study. He noted he is at a loss of words <br />on how they could possibly leave State Route 84 improvements out of the recommended <br />alternative. He hopes that consensus can be achieved with Pleasanton's counterparts in <br />the long-run. He added it is hard to refute the data that has been presented and the <br />inclusion of State Route 84 should be looked at favorably. He added when all is said and <br />done, if they are not able to achieve consensus with the other bodies, perhaps the Council <br />would agree to have staff make a presentation directly to the CMA. <br />Hearing no further requests to speak, public comment was closed. <br />Mayor Hosterman noted staff is recommending that a letter be written by her to the <br />Alameda County Congestion Management Agency stating the City of Pleasanton's <br />concerns with the recommendation adopted by the PAC. She also indicated she would <br />like to see if the counterparts would be willing to sit down at the table once again and give <br />the City of Pleasanton the opportunity to revisit this issue and see if consensus can be <br />reached. She asked staff to make those phone calls tomorrow and see if something can <br />be scheduled. She added, in the meantime, since this is so political, she thinks there <br />might be an opportunity for staff to be helpful and asked support from the Council to ask <br />staff to sit down with the technical staff and city managers of the other agencies and share <br />what was talked about earlier to see if consensus amongst staff can be reached. If that <br />could be accomplished prior to the PAC meeting perhaps that would be helpful regarding <br />further deliberations and discussions regarding what makes sense for the region. <br />Councilmember Thorne supported the efforts to get the counterparts back to the table to <br />try to reach consensus. He advised that when he makes a decision on Stoneridge Drive, <br />he intends to make that decision based on data, facts, and input from the community. He <br />City Council Minutes 6 April 3, 2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.