Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION NO. 07-101 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON, <br />DENYING THE APPEAL OF CASE PAP-105, THEREBY UPHOLDING BUT <br />MODIFYING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF THE <br />APPLICATION OF TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH FOR A CONDITIONAL USE <br />PERMIT AND DESIGN REVIEW, AS FILED UNDER CASE <br />PCUP-155/PDR-513 <br />WHEREAS, Trinity Lutheran Church has applied for a conditional use permit and <br />design review for the expansion of the existing Trinity Lutheran Church, located at <br />1225 Hopyard Road, consisting of the replacement of the existing temporary modular <br />buildings with an approximately 8,100-square-foot one-story education building to the east <br />of the existing Church facility; the construction of an approximately 3,108-square-foot <br />multipurpose room addition to be attached to the south of the existing Church facility, <br />fronting Hopyard Road; the expansion of the existing parking lot; and on-site landscaping <br />removal and replanting; and <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is R-1-6,500 (Single-Family Residential) <br />District; and <br />WHEREAS, at its meeting of January 24, 2007, the Planning Commission, after <br />having considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of City <br />staff concerning this application, approved the application for conditional use permit and <br />design review; and <br />WHEREAS, within the time specified by the Pleasanton Municipal Code, Heather <br />Brillhart submitted an appeal (Case PAP-105) of the decision of the Planning Commission; <br />and <br />WHEREAS, at its meeting of March 20, 2007, the City Council received a report <br />from the Acting Director of Planning and Community Development, together with a copy of <br />the staff report to the Planning Commission, regarding this matter; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on March 20, 2007, at which <br />time the appellant and other members of the public, including the applicant, presented <br />evidence regarding this appeal; and <br />WHEREAS, actions of this nature are categorically exempt from the <br />requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, <br />Section 15302, Replacement and Reconstruction, Class 2, Subsection (a); and <br />WHEREAS, after receiving public testimony and reviewing the materials <br />presented, the City Council made the findings set forth in the attached Exhibit A and <br />determined that the proposed conditional use and design review are appropriate for the <br />site, will not detrimentally affect the surrounding properties, and are consistent with the <br />zoning regulations for the zoning district of the property. <br />