My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/26/85
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
PC 11/26/85
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 10:56:23 AM
Creation date
4/24/2007 4:50:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/26/1985
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 11/26/85
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes <br />Planning Commissio <br />November 26, 1985 <br />19 custom lots); removal of upper townhouses, in his opinion, <br />mitigate most of the reported significant effects. To the extent <br />that any may remain the overriding factors that he sees for <br />allowing the project would be (a) a history of the property since <br />the 1960s in helping to preserve the integrity of the City <br />(Johnson was there when the City needed him, and that is worth <br />something); (b) resolution of the substance of the annexation <br />agreement relative to anticipated development concepts (density <br />and sewer capacity) (c) resolution of the mutual parties relative <br />to sewer and water assessment district; (The City "sold" Johnson <br />617 dwelling units worth of capacity in a sewer main. They don't <br />want all of that but they are requesting 224 units as a fair <br />trade); (d) would be recognition of the prior dedication of the <br />230 acre parcel; (e) would be the inclusion of at least one-half <br />million dollars to the City for access road to get up to the <br />park; (f) would be Housing Element compliance for the lots) (g) <br />would be preserve the historical Bernal adobe and the historic <br />barn adjacent to it; (h) preserves 90 acres of permanent open <br />space above the development saving the vast majority of the trees <br />on the property. There is an additional 75-80 acres of open <br />space preserved with the development, that would also be owned by <br />the homeowners. They have some suggested conditions about the <br />use of that. It is suggested that the area in between the <br />dwelling units within the common open areas occupying the bench <br />areas of the project be planted with 1, 5, 15 gallon trees are to <br />be planted in random growth patterns to screen future homes. <br />They would be native species such as California coastal live <br />oaks, California sycamore, buckeyes and blue oaks with a support <br />drip irrigation system. They have in mind foresting the open <br />area, not just planting a few trees. There are only three lots <br />backing up to existing homes. The applicant would like to add a <br />condition "Upon recordation of the final subdivision map, the <br />developer shall offer to sell to each of the three presently <br />existing homeowners whose lots abut lots 23 and 24 in the <br />proposed site plan a 20' strip of land abutting each of these <br />lots. The 20' strips will be offered for sale by the developer <br />to the three homeowners upon reasonable and mutually acceptable <br />terms and conditions including price." It is their intention to <br />be generous in this regard. <br />Chairman Wilson asked about the installation and maintenance of <br />the landscaping. Mr. Fairfield indicated that the homeowners <br />association will maintain all privately owned landscaping <br />including landscaping of existing City right-of-way. There is a <br />minimum of 20' and one half of this area will be over 50'. <br />Commissioner Innes inquired about he 670' elevation line and how <br />it was established. Mr. Fairfield explained that it relates to <br />water pressure and recommendation of the General Plan Review <br />Committee. Commissioner Innes asked if it took into <br />consideration visual impacts or slope of the lands or was it <br />based on the water service itself. Mr. Fairfield said visual <br />impacts and slopes were considered, but it is also immediately <br />below where the heavy tree growth goes up. In fact, they don't <br />abut trees in the most of the area. <br />- 6 - <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.