My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/26/85
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
PC 11/26/85
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 10:56:23 AM
Creation date
4/24/2007 4:50:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/26/1985
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 11/26/85
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes <br />Planning Commissio <br />November 26, 1985 <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />Ted C. Fairfield, Consulting Civil Engineer, P. O. Box 1148, <br />Pleasanton, CA, presented exhibits and indicated he represented <br />the Walter Johnson Foundation, the owner of the property. Mr. <br />Fairfield explained that while Mr. Johnson passed away in 1978 <br />the property is still in the Johnson family. He then proceeded <br />to review the history of the property. <br />Mr. Fairfield indicated that in 1962 he was retained by the City <br />on a consultant basis to act as City Engineer. At that time he <br />became familiar with the property. The property included 560 <br />acres including the 230 acre City park which has since been <br />dedicated to the City. This acreage was included as part of a <br />water assessment district with assessments based upon the General <br />Plan of the City at the time. Several hundred dwelling units <br />worth of water were paid for in that water assessment. IN 1963 <br />Mr. Fairfield met with Walter Johnson and Johnson's sons-in-law <br />on behalf of the City to encourage annexation of the property. <br />The Johnson family was not in favor of this annexation at the <br />time. In 1965 the Johnson family changed their mind. The City <br />convinced them that annexation was essential as part of the <br />natural growth of the City as it would protect the west side of <br />Foothill Road against the possibility of coming under the <br />influence of Oakland or Hayward. There was an annexation <br />agreement signed which stated in part that it was mutually <br />contemplated the development of the property would be Medium <br />Density for everything east of Foothill Road with a 4.7 dwelling <br />unit/acre average. The west side of Foothill up to the basic <br />tree line was to be Low Density Residential. It was mutually <br />anticipated then that there would be between 600-700 dwelling <br />units on the Johnson property. It was also agreed that the City <br />would use best efforts to reserve sewer capacity for development. <br />The sewer moratorium slowed things down. In 1965 Johnson was <br />approached by the Televue Company and he allowed a community <br />antennae on his property for the use of Pleasanton residents. In <br />1967-69 Mr. Fairfield worked on behalf of the City and negotiated <br />with Mr. Johnson for the 67-1 assessment district which would <br />build a sewer system for west Pleasanton from Highland Oaks south <br />including all of the development on Foothill Road, including <br />Castlewood Country Club. Johnson paid for and received 716 <br />dwelling unit capacity in that system. In 1971 Walter Johnson <br />sold 230 acres to the City for $1.00 for their use as a park on <br />the ridge. This was one-half of his land holdings. He intended <br />access to the park would come about as the surrounding property <br />developed. The City then had a sewer moratorium and amended its <br />General Plan to drastically reduce the holding capacity for the <br />entire area and downzoned the property to 191 dwelling units. <br />Staff comes up with a lower number of dwelling units than this. <br />Mr. Fairfield indicated they discussed their application in July <br />1984 and more than 12 versions of the plans have since been <br />submitted. An effort was made to resolve differences as <br />described. His design team consisted of professionals in the <br />fields of traffic, water archaeology, geology, botany, land <br />planning, civil engineering and environmentalists. He felt he <br />- 4 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.