Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes <br />Planning Commissio <br />September 11, 1985 <br />Gregory Mix, 205 Main Street, the architect for the project, <br />again urged approval of the General Pan changes without <br />Conditions one and two. He would suggest in their place that a <br />condition be added that if other projects are approved in the <br />interim that any left-turn lane be worked out with the <br />Engineering staff and the applicant. If it couldn't be worked <br />out the project would not be allowed to proceed. Commissioner <br />Innes stated that if staff went along with this proposal, it <br />would create a zig-zag effect. Commissioner Innes then asked if <br />this proposal was previously presented to staff. Mr. Mix <br />indicated that he didn't realize the left-turn lane was an issue <br />until recently. <br />Mr. M. Jones, 4023 Stanley Boulevard, indicated he has lived at <br />this location since 1927. He said the street widening would come <br />to within 12 feet of his front door. Heeis opposed to the High <br />Density Residential land use designation for the 11 lots as <br />proposed. He further said that the owner of the Bottini <br />property, his son behind him, and his daughter who also have <br />property next to his are also opposed. <br />Earl Augusta, 3963 Stanley Boulevard, stated that Payne's request <br />is just the beginning of what will happen on this street. The <br />traffic is already tremendous. If Payne is approved there will <br />be other development. He clarified the intent of his letter <br />which asked him to be included in a General Plan change. He is <br />not in favor of a General Plan change to High Density, but if it <br />does occur he doesn't feel his property will be suitable for <br />single-family use and therefore requests that his property be <br />changed to High Density Residential also. <br />Commissioner Lindsey asked Mr. Augusta if Valley Avenue was <br />completed if this would relieve traffic a significant amount on <br />Stanley Boulevard. Mr. Augusta felt the change would be minimal. <br />Gary Ingram, 3900 Stanley Boulevard, indicated he just recently <br />purchased his lot. It is 60' x 80'. If the street was widened <br />it would have a detrimental effect on his property. His real <br />estate agent told him that the north side would be condominiums <br />with the south side being bike lanes and sidewalk. Nothing was <br />said about the widening of the street. His house sets 17' off of <br />the street right now. He spoke against changing the land use <br />designation of the north side of High Density Residential. <br />Brent Wilcox, 3998 Stanley Boulevard, spoke for his parents, the <br />owners of the property. He could go along with High Density <br />Residential, but didn't want the street over 60' wide. He felt <br />that the 8-12 units/acre designation discussed at the joint <br />Planning Commission City Council meeting might be considered. He <br />spoke to traffic projections. He urged that Conditions No. 1 and <br />2 remain as proposed by staff. He asked that Condition No. 8 be <br />dropped. He suggested an amendment to require four lanes being <br />66' be added. <br />Jay Leone, 5286 Crestline Way, owner of the proeprty shown as <br />that owned by "Murphy" was opposed to a High Density Residential <br />- 4 - <br />r. _.. .. _. _ _ _. ._ T <br />