PC 07/24/85 - Laserfiche WebLink

Minutes Planning Commissioi July 24, 1985 A motion was made by Commissioner Innes, seconded by Commissioner Hoyt that PUD-85-14 be recommended for approval subject to the conditions of the staff report. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Hoyt, Innes, Lindsey, Wellman and Chairman Wilson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. 2683 was entered and adopted recommending approval of Case PUD-85-14 as motioned. A motion was made by Commissioner Lindsey, seconded by Commissioner Wellman that findings shown in the staff report for UP-85-27 are made and that this application be approved subject to the conditions shown in the staff report. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW Modification to Sunrise Villa Mr. Swift presented the staff report asking for direction in approving the proposed modification. Bill Hirst, 235 Main Street, represented Mr. Loving. He understands that Mr. Loving's group did not own the parcel at the time the rental restriction was imposed. The rent restriction was not recorded. Chairman Wilson asked how long these units have been occupied. Mr. Hirst responded that they have been occupied approximately 1-1/2 years. Commissioner Lindsey stated that even though the applicant did know about the restriction when they purchased the property, he did not have a problem in removing it inasmuch as a very small number of units are involved. After discussion the Planning Commission stated that in their opinion the modification was insubstantial in nature and should be treated as a minor modification. They instructed staff to follow suggestion No. 1 of the staff report. ROLL CALL VOTE MOTION: Commissioner Lindsey SECOND: Chairman Wilson AYES: Commissioners Hoyt, Chairman Wilson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None - 18 - Innes, Lindsey, Wellman and ., -r