PC 09/10/86 - Laserfiche WebLink

Minutes Planning Commission September 10, 1986 PUD-86-13, Castlewood Properties Application of Castlewood Properties for rezoning from the "A" (Agricultural) to the PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Medium Density Residential District and development plan approval for a 12 parcel single-family residential development, to be located on an approximately 5.2 acre site, located generally in the area north of Mission Hills Park. Chairman Lindsey announced that these items would be discussed simultaneously, but acted on separately. Mr. Swift presented the staff reports recommending approval of Cases GP-86-3 and PUD-86-13 noting that Conditions No. 4, 9, and 17 are proposed to be amended by the applicant as shown on the document distributed to the Commissioners. Staff agrees to these proposed changes. Commissioner Wellman asked if there are any conditions proposed for Lot 3 fencing. Mr. Swift said there are none proposed. It is possible to fence the lot to achieve privacy if care is taken by the developer. Commissioner Wellman then asked about the type of lighting to be involved. Mr. swift reported that the Police Department has requested street lights be specifically located at Dolores Drive/Place, directly in front of the park itself (no lighting within the park), and one at the end of the cul-de-sac situated to flood down the pathway. The Commission has requested the pathway be widened as well. Commissioner Wellman asked if there was any discussion with the homeowners association. Mr. Swift indicated the applicant would respond to this question. The public hearing was opened. Greg Mix, 205-A Main Street, represented Castlewood Properties. Mr. Mix indicated they have worked long and hard to get the project to work by having numerous meetings with the neighbors and staff. He thanked all of the neighbors for their participation and cooperation during this period of negotiations. The plan as proposed represents the very best compromise reached between neighbors and developer. The reason for bringing the development plan in for approval with the General Plan is to insure the neighbors that what is being proposed is in fact what will be developed. It is clear the solution is to have 12 lots surrounding a private park. Mr. Mix indicated that they are in agreement with all of the conditions recommended for approval, amending No. 4, 9 and 17 as indicated. He went on record as not being in favor of Condition No. 11 because of the cost involved but they will not oppose it. Mr. Mix further stated that it is not being proposed that the developer provide fencing. They will, however, provide a final fencing plan at the time of final map submittal. - 7 - .. r