PC 09/03/86 - Laserfiche WebLink

Minutes of the Continued Planning Commission Meeting of 8/27/86 Held on 9/3/86 DeWitt Wilson, 1784 Beachwood Way, President of the Alameda County Fair Association, stated the Rose Avenue extension sounds great, but in fact would have to be extended 600 feet south because of the elevation of the bridge. Commissioner Innes said he had no Residential for the area but with or appropriate. Traffic circulation support Medium Density Residential could show an extension could be feasible. objections to High Density ily one entrance would not be would not work. He could until such time as somebody done and it is financially Chairman Lindsey stated that because of the surrounding development including the Fairgrounds and mixed uses, this area should be High Density Residential in his opinion. Traffic could be analyzed at the time of development. Commissioner Michelotti was hoping that the property owners would want to retain the beautiful area. Commissioner Michelotti then commented that she supports Commissioner Innes. Commissioner Innes supported Medium Density Residential as access is not present to the properties. Vote: MDR - 5-0 Parcel 13 - Stanley Boulevard Brent Wilcox, represented George and Marylou of 3988 Stanley Boulevard. They agree with the staff's position on their property. He just wanted to reiterate special circumstances relating to traffic and land use. Mr. Wilcox wished to thank publicly Mr. Robert Okamura for all of his work on the special committee. Vote: MDR (6.7 acres) and HDR (5.5 acres) - 5.0 Parcel 15 - Marsh Commissioner Innes said he could not support Industrial because of the topography. Commissioner Innes said he could support the CFA. Commissioner Wellman could not support housing for the property because of the noise impacts. Vote: CFA 5-0 Parcel 16 - Heaton Mr. Lee presented the staff recommendation of CFA. Vote: CFA 5-0 - 12 - _. _ _ ___.r _.