My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 08/27/86
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
PC 08/27/86
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 11:04:48 AM
Creation date
4/23/2007 4:27:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/27/1986
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 08/27/86
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes <br />August 27, 1986 <br />Planning Commission <br />Page VI-12, add a new program as follows: <br />Program 5.2: Design local storm drainage improvements to <br />carry appropriate design year flows resulting from buildout of <br />the General Plan <br />Program 5.3: Work with Zone 7 to complete planned, regional <br />storm drainage improvements <br />Program 5.4: Require new development to improve local storm <br />drainage systems to accept appropriate design year flows, as <br />determined by the City Engineer, resulting from new development. <br />Commissioner Michelotti referred to Page VI-9, Schools. Mr. Lee <br />said staff is trying to keep current on this matter. <br />CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT <br />The Planning Commission supported the staff's recommendations. <br />Commissioner Wellman asked for discussion of the Program <br />relating to development to within 200' of the ridge land. <br />Mr. Lee explained that this program originated with the <br />Residential Review Committee and is to protect the ridgeland <br />view. An example would be the house on the ridge built in the <br />City of Hayward which sits on the ridge facing Pleasanton. This <br />type of development would be regulated. Commissioner Berger <br />discussed the 670' site development standard on the ridge. <br />NOISE ELEMENT <br />The Planning Commission supported the staff's recommendations. <br />AIR QUALITY ELEMENT <br />Mr. Lee explained the monitoring of the environmental review <br />committee. Worse case is the standard used. <br />Commissioner Michelotti alluded to Mr. Tarver's suggestion which <br />would call for monitoring residential development in some form. <br />Mr. Lee said the State of the City report addressed the <br />cumulative effects of traffic and noise. <br />Commissioner Innes wanted performance standards put into place to <br />monitor the LOS traffic, and take action to see the standards are <br />not exceeded. Mitigation for traffic concerns should have a <br />positive effect on air quality. <br />- 13 - <br />__.. r. _._ .._ _ _ _ __.._ _ _ _._ _ _ _ .., . j. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.