My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 07/23/86
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
PC 07/23/86
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 11:05:04 AM
Creation date
4/23/2007 4:21:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/23/1986
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 07/23/86
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending approval. <br />Commissioner Innes expressed concern with the occupancy load of <br />the building. Mr. Swift stated that the Building and Fire <br />Departments had no concern with this matter. <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />No one addressed this item and the public hearing was closed. <br />Commissioner Innes couldn't support this application because he <br />felt the occupancy load was too high. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Michelotti, seconded by <br />Commissioner Hoyt that Case UP-86-31 be approved subject to the <br />conditions of the staff report as all findings shown therein are <br />made. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Hoyt, Michelotti and Chairman Lindsey <br />NOES: Commissioner Innes <br />ABSENT: Commissioners Berger and Wellman <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Resolution No. 2810 was entered and adopted approving Case <br />UP-86-31 as motioned. <br />Tract 5521, Gregorson/Smith <br />Application to subdivide an approximately 2.9 acre site into ten <br />parcels, ranging in size from approximately 7215 sq. ft. to <br />approximately 16,950 sq. ft., located on the south side of <br />Flagstone Drive between Hillcrest Way and Forest Hill Drive. <br />Zoning for the property is R-1-6500 (single-family Residential) <br />District. <br />Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending approval of <br />this application. <br />Commissioner Michelotti asked how the proposed soundwall would <br />fit in with the existing fencing program. Mr. Swift stated it is <br />conditioned to come back with the design for review. He <br />anticipates this type of fence won't be grape stake but whether <br />it will be a soundwall or masonry hasn't been determined. <br />Commissioner Innes asked how the soundwall would blend in. <br />Mr. Swift stated staff is proposing landscaping in the front of <br />the wall so that there will not be too much difficulty in having <br />it be compatible with the existing fencing. Inasmuch as the lots <br />are lower than the fence line, a soundwall will not be needed to <br />attenuate noise. <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />- 6 - <br />r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.