PC 07/23/86 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mark Sweeney, 4858 Cobbler Court, Pleasanton, addressed the Commission at the invitation of Commissioner Innes. Commissioner Innes then asked Mr. Sweeney what is allowed in the commercial center as he thought all markets were specifically disallowed in the retail centers of Hacienda Business Park. Mr. Swift stated that the PUD approval allows uses as shown in the CN, CR, and CC Districts. The CC&Rs have a much more restrictive set of uses. Mr. Sweeney said they do not intend to allow a supermarket use in Hacienda Business Park. This is restricted through the deeds. Longs Drugs, Safeway, Alpha Beta and others are specifically named in the restrictions as not being allowed. The use proposed in fact, is a large delicatessen with the sale of no drygoods. Commissioner Innes said he would like Condition No. 8 changed so that Buildings #1 and #4 would come back before the Planning Commission and City Council. This will give the City a larger view and see exactly what is happening on site. Chairman Lindsey said he is comfortable with Building No. 1 being worked out with staff. Mr. Swift said staff could review this and it would be brought back as a major or minor modification. Commissioner Innes had a problem with the back of the buildings as currently shown. Chairman Lindsey said this could be worked out with a minor modification. Mr. Swift asked that staff be able to review the elevations with a report back to the Planning Commission. Commissioner Michelotti was concerned with the time frame of the completion of Hopyard improvements and the occupancy of the retail center. Mr. Sweeney stated the construction of the Hacienda Interchange improvements will be completed by December 1987 and they will try to insure that intersection improvements are in place when this retail center is occupied. Commissioner Michelotti thanked Mr. Sweeney for addressing this issue. A motion was made by Commissioner Innes, seconded by Commissioner Hoyt to recommend approval of Case PUD-81-30-35D subject to the conditions of the staff report allowing staff to work with the applicant in implementing Condition No. 7, modifying Condition No. 8 to add that the Planning Director shall review and report to the Planning Commission on the appropriateness of the final design for building No. 1 prior to issuance of building permits. This recommendation also included the elimination of Standard Condition No. 9. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Hoyt, Innes, Michelotti and Chairman Lindsey NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Berger and Wellman ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. 2813 was entered and adopted recommending approval of Case PUD-81-30-35D as motioned. - 10 -