Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Hoyt said he had no idea what the proposed building <br />lpoked Iike. <br />Mr. Swift presented a blueprint of the proposed building for the <br />Commissioners viewing. <br />Chairman Lindsey stated that after seeing the blueprint he felt <br />the project fell in line with what was normally approved. <br />Mr. Alldaffer pointed out the color scheme to be used. <br />Chairman Lindsey asked the applicant if he could agree to the <br />conditions of the staff report. The applicant said he could. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />The applicant went back to the Commissioners and painted out <br />where the sign would be placed. <br />Chairman Lindsey asked Mr. Alldaffer how the Hacienda Business <br />Fark Association felt about the signage. Mr. Alldaffer said <br />that only one sign had been approved and that the Association <br />fluctuated back and forth in their opinion of the other. <br />Commissioner Michelotti asked if it is standard to have signage <br />denoting cocF:tails. The applicant replied that it is and that <br />he has one in San Francisco.' <br />Chairman Lindsey said he could not approve the signage if <br />opposed by the Hacienda Business Park Association. <br />Commissioner Tarver stated he would like to follow staff`s <br />recommendation regarding the sign. <br />Commissioner Berger and Hoyt also agreed with staff <br />recommendation regarding the signage. <br />R motion was made by Commissioner Berger,- seconded b•~ <br />Commissioner Michelotti recommending approval of Case Nn. <br />F'UD-81-3C~-41D subject to the conditions of the staff report. <br />ROLL_CALL_VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Berger, !-!o•~t, Michelotti , Tarti~er, <br />and Chairman Lindsey <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Resolution No. F'C-87-119 was entered and adopted recommending <br />approving Case FUD-Bi--~~i-41D as motioned. <br />Rage ? <br />... _......._ ...................... <br />_ _ <br />-.. __ _ . <br />. r._._. _..-..., _ <br />