Laserfiche WebLink
AYES: Commissioners Hoyt, Mahern, Mlchelottl, Tarver, and Chairperson <br />Lindsey <br />NOES: None <br />ASSENT: Cornmisala~er Berger <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Resolution NO. PC-87-88 was entered and adopted approving Case Tract 5812 <br />sub)eCt to the condtttor-s of the staff report as amended. <br />Mr. Swift gave a summary of the staff report, noting staff recommendation for <br />approval. <br />Canmissioner Michelotti asked it staff knew how many more dealerships we were <br />going to get. Mr. Swift did not know. <br />The public hearing was opened <br />Martin Incterbitzen, representing the applicant, was caught unaware of a problem <br />with the signage portion of the appiicatton and requests that that portion be <br />removed and brought back to the Commission. <br />There was Commission consensus 1n support of bringing the signage portion back <br />before the Ca~nission. <br />Mr. inderbitzen addressed sane condttta-s specifically: (1) Condition s2 is <br />'open-ended' and the applicant requests the right to protest twt only the total <br />amount but the method of spread. (2) Condition ~3 was clarified and the applicant <br />stated agreement. (3) Condition ~91s unnecessary. <br />Planning Commission <br />Minutes 17 July 22, 1987 <br />