PC 07/22/87 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Swift explained that the Council had dented the application without prejudice in order to allow Lhe applic~ion to go before the full Council. Therefore, the application had to come Dark to the Canmission before returning to the Council. Co~nrntssioner Tarver t-ated he didn't sr the ori9tnai application and he feels the apprbprtate place for this is back before the Cour-cii. Commissioner M1t~elotti suggested that it would be ura-ecessary tor' the a~licant to go through the presentation. Commissioner Hoyt concurred with the previous comments of the Commissioners. Chairperson Lindsey concurred with the comments by Canmissioner Tarver but also felt 1t was important to allow for public comment. The public hearing was opened. Tom St. Denr-is, 4239 Pleasanton Avenue, suggested that there was a contention that this application could be considered as a commercial development. Chair!f~ersvn limey clarified that the application ur-der consideration Is residential. Jud~r M~hew, 610 Mato Street, representing the Downtown Association, said the Ovw~own Association is not taking a stand either for or against the application but recommerxls delayfng a decision until the specific plan 1s completed. Chairperson Lindsey asked it the Downtown Association had had the opportunity to make ttiaR suggestion to the Council. Jurllr Mahew answered that they had made this same suggestion to the Council. Bill Aibee, 855 Main Street, said he had dust learned about this approval. Or-e of his concerns is with bulldozing a historical building. The public hearing was closed. Commissioner Mahern said the Commission has approved projects in the Downtown area. Mr. Swift cited some examples. It was noted that City Councllmember Brandes had asked it the Council wanted a moratorium wh11e the plan was in process but received no support. Planning Commission Minutes 14 July 22, 1987