PC 01/14/87 - Laserfiche WebLink

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 14, 1987 be unlike the perishable deliveries and it is anticipated there would be probably two deliveries per week. Mr. Horsely further reported that the tenant wants a 10' rollup door so that he can stockpile merchandise before it is moved into the warehouse. There will be no truck requirement for the type of tenant they will have. Mr. Swift reported that staff is satisfied as this is a very different kind of operation compared to a grocery store. Jay Bennett, 3172 Weymouth Court, supported the application, and stated that the applicant's have done a good job in designing the project. The trees proposed will soften the impact of the noise. Commissioner Hoyt said the developers have done a good job in putting the two shopping centers together. The center, in his opinion, is aesthetically pleasing. Commissioner Berger was sympathetic to the concerns of the neighbors relating to noise. Commissioner Michelotti addressed the location of the dumpster and suggested that with the help of the City and Mr. Ferreri problems of the dumpster noise can be minimized. Vice Chairman Innes discussed standard condition No. 56 relating to installation of cable in the center vs use of a satellite dish. Vice Chairman Innes also addressed Condition No. 6 regarding the size and quantity of trees. Vice Chairman Innes would like to see a condition added relating to preventing the roots of the trees from encroaching into the yards of the residential neighbors to the east. Vice Chairman Innes acknowledged that the drawings are conceptual, but there is a maximum space of 25'. There is nothing in the conditions demanding the loading area for the major tenant be on the south side. A semi-truck could get into the area. Mr. Swift stated that the development plan would have to be modified to have this happen. Vice Chairman Innes wanted a condition added that there shall be no loading dock on the east side of the building. Mr. Horsley said they do show a door on the south elevation intended to service the major tenant. Commissioner Michelotti asked if the applicant would object to a condition relating to the service door on the east side. The Commissioners then discussed with Mr. Horsley the loading dock arrangements proposed. Vice Chairman Innes commented that 10' rollup doors invite forklift operations. Vice Chairman Innes then asked the applicant if at the time he submitted plans for a building permit, he would be prepared to declare what is intended as far as cable television is concerned. Mr. Horsley said they plan on using cable in the building. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Michelotti, seconded by Commissioner Berger that the negative declaration prepared for - 6 -