My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22 ATTACHMENT 1
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
060507
>
22 ATTACHMENT 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2007 12:27:21 PM
Creation date
4/16/2007 12:27:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/5/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
22 ATTACHMENT 1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"As the number of patients in the state of California who rely upon medical cannabis for their treatment <br />continues to grow, it is increasingly imperativ<~ that cities and counties address the issue of dispensaries in <br />our respective communities. !n the city of Oakland we recognized this need and adopted an ordinance <br />which balances patients' need for safe access to treatment while reassuring the community that these <br />dispensaries are run right. A tangential benefit of the dispensaries has been that they have helped to <br />stimulate economic development in the areas where they are located. " <br />- Desley Brooks, Oakland City Councilmember <br />ABOUT THIS REPORT <br />Land-use decisions are now part of the irrlple- <br />mentation of California's medical marijuana, <br />or cannabis, laws. As a result, medical cannabis <br />dispensing collectives (dispensaries) are the <br />subject of considerable debate by planning <br />and other local officials. Dispensaries have' <br />been operating openly in many communities <br />since the passage of Proposition 215 in 1996. <br />As a compassionate, community-based <br />response to the problems patients face in try- <br />ing to access cannabis, dispensaries are cur- <br />rently used by more than half of all patients in <br />the state and are essential to those most seri- <br />ously ill or injured. Since 2003, when the legis- <br />lature further implemented state law by <br />expressly addressing the issue of patient col- <br />lectivesand compensation for cannabis, more <br />dispensaries have opened and more comrnuni- <br />ties have been faced with questions about <br />business permits and land use options. <br />In an attempt to clarify the issues involved, <br />Americans for Safe Access has conducted a <br />survey of local officials in addition to continu- <br />ously tracking regulatory activity throughout <br />the state. (safeaccessnow.org/regulations.} The <br />report that follows outlines some of the <br />underlying questions and provides an <br />overview of the experiences of cities and <br />counties around the state. In many parts cif <br />California, dispensaries have operated respon- <br />siblyand provided essential services to they <br />most needy without local intervention, but <br />city and county officials are also considering <br />how to arrive at the most effective regulations <br />for their community, ones that respect the <br />rights of patients for safe and legal access <br />within the context of the larger community. <br />ABOUT AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS <br />Americans for Safe Access (ASA) is the largest <br />national member-based organization of <br />patients, medical professionals, scientists and <br />concerned citizens promoting safe and legal <br />access to cannabis for therapeutic uses and <br />research. ASA works in partnership with state, <br />local and national legislators to overcome bar- <br />riers and create policies that improve access to <br />cannabis for patients and researchers. We <br />have more than 30,000 active members with <br />chapters and affiliates in more than 40 states. <br />THE NATIONAL POLITICAL LANDSCAPE <br />A substantial majority of Americans support <br />safe and legal access to medical cannabis. <br />Public opinion polls in every part of the coun- <br />try show majority support cutting across politi- <br />cal and demographic lines. Among them, a <br />Time/CNN poll in 2002 showed 80% national <br />support; a survey of AARP members in 2004 <br />showed 72% of older Americans support legal <br />access, with those in the western states polling <br />82% in favor. <br />This broad popular consensus, combined with <br />an intransigent federal government which <br />For more Information, see evevw.AmericansForSafeACCess.org or contact the ASA office at 1-888-9Z9-4367 or 510-251-1856. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.