Laserfiche WebLink
i t . Sh0 su€ ported a higher or more duet or d~.~pl e.; taomes giving <br />s:-:o~-e space ~-et~een hflmes. She su~~orted the school impact fees <br />b.ut :yas not asi l l i ng to condi ti or ~ the project to that. <br />ivosromi ssi over 9"ia horn supported a Woos al i gn~-rier:t or, Fcoth i l 1 hood <br />and felt . t asoul d reduce accidents i f i t were straightened o;_ct , <br />but F:_eep some modest curves. She supported bi~;es Panes and <br />paths being separatLd f ram the road. She ryas nest i n f aver of <br />spPittir,•g it around the Rdobe. She supported emergency vehicPe <br />access. St-ae was not :. n favor of gated community but had no reap <br />ob jest i ors to i t . She favored havi sag ti-ie developer pay the <br />impact fee for- schools and felt the project should be <br />conditioned as recommended b}~ staff in Item Es. In regard to <br />Land L;r:it S, she favored indi~,ridual homes :yith larger yard <br />spaces and could support 4,~tG~~ square foot Iots where the baL~; <br />yard P o;=,Rs onto an open space. She asoul d aI so ascent homes to <br />bP end i n tai th irohat i s already on Foothi I P and Bernal . Si-~e alas <br />in favor of the pare and ti-ae oiler: space. <br />Co:rsmi ssi ones Hovi ngia ryas opposed to pr i vote access and gated <br />community. If the gated community is not dune, then he :yould <br />advocate putting that space to longer Ifits. !!n Land Unit ~ he <br />would Pie~e to see ~ ero-I of I i ne and 4, ~ ~Ct~s square foot I ots. Fie <br />supported ti'ie emergeracv access road, and tiers l~?~ alignment of <br />Foothill ~:oad. He favored in lieu fees for the school district. <br />t=li th regard to the facing o-f the resi dent i aP units, he proposed <br />tieing that to the availability of the school capacity. <br />Cherirrean i'°7ichelotti supported the proposed road alignment i-aith <br />some c~:r-ves I i k:e those done on the oI d Specific F'P err:. She <br />favored bide and pedestrian patt-fs go along tine old alignment. <br />In regard to open space, she mould like to see the developer <br />maintain part of the cspen space that they have shoasn. She <br />favored open fencing asiaere at all possible. She fa~~ored Tots no <br />ssriaPPer than 2~':,~-c~sc~ square feet alor:g Foothill F:oad and ~ernaP <br />€~venue and that this be designated in the Specific Plan. i?ther <br />I ors might then have a feathering effect . She aaas not total 1 y <br />oppL:sed to a gated community, bows:-er, this would be Ioo~:-ed at <br />again at the i='UI1 stage. She asould still favor open space e~.ren <br />i f there i s a gated community and felt i t alas used . Stae <br />supported oiler. fencing as ms_ich as possible. On Land Ur: i t L± she <br />favored a plan :roith taasnhouses asith about ~.~ units per acre <br />asith the bac~;s of the toasnhouses facing the freeasay. She <br />suggested duets might wori::. She recommended that both plans <br />come back:: at ti-ae PE!T~ stage. <br />Final Commission F~ecommendations <br />1 . So ssi th new aI i gnrr~ent to Footh <br />?. Incorporate the concept <br />cos-~-munity snot totally orpased <br />_ . i=:etai n ti-se desi gnati an cf <br />homes, possibly toasnhomes. <br />4. =:stain e:r+ergenc~~ access road. <br />Page <br />ill Road tmajorit}ft. <br />of a private access, gated <br />or ~ to 1 ? . <br />Land unit S for single famil';~ <br />i3 <br />