Laserfiche WebLink
C~nnae Eccles, f4 Castledown Read, spo~:e rn behalf of about ?~s <br />pilot :Wember and associates wlhose aim is tv prcitect the <br />`ivermore #~irport. She presented a ?otter to the Com~•Wission and <br />staff rlh3 Ch recam:-Wended that no residential deR~el opment be <br />p 1 armed for the Staples Ranch , best that i t be p Z armed for- :. i ght <br />industrial, service commercial, part:. or aspen space. Cln the 1'7 <br />acres south:,~est, they suggested no residential east of the <br />F'Ieasantcn Meadows line. <br />Chris HaynarW, ~;{}~;~ Ferndale Ct. , represer:ted a group of at~c;ut <br />i~9 Pleasanton Meadows concerned citizens far the redirection: of <br />Stoneridge Drive. He e;;pressed concern about having ttee <br />Stoneridge Drive directly behind their t3ome5 in F`leasanton <br />Meadows; they are concerned eri th traffic and noise; tt-~ey are <br />art:: i ng that a medium density housing buffer be put betr-seen thei r <br />properties and any additional development on the Ct-9u property. <br />He presented a handout for the proposed redirection of <br />Stoneri dge Dri `re to tt'ae Commi ssi ore and staff and dent ever i t <br />for them. He e:~pressed corscern that a soundwall might have t` <br />be ^ut up to mitigate noise and he was not i n favor of I oei r ~g <br />their vi esy far a sear:dalai i . <br />Chairman Micheletti ast~ed ho~-! mane people in the audience had <br />the same concerns e::pressed by t''fr. tia}fnam. Rbout ~+:~ people <br />rased their hands. <br />Donald Reynolds, ~9~:J~y Yor;:sh i re Ct . , said i f the proposed <br />Stoneradge Read seas broesght along k-raiser property, there alcrLt? d <br />be no need for a soundwall. He expressed concerns about truc~•s <br />that carry chemicals and gas that aloe_eld be coming along <br />Stoneridge Drive that might go off the road and into the canal. <br />Mr. ! ee said li€=:e most city streets tre_tct:-s would be prohibited. <br />Andy. Fagan , ?4S~ :'ermont Place, said he W'soved to the area f ~. ve <br />months ago. He wished to emphasiLe to the Commission that the~~ <br />needed tc consider butt: noise and visual impacts in the <br />al i gnment of Stoneri dge Drive. He did not favor- a sounriwal i <br />along the Arro}'o and said i t woL:l d affect about ;r, property <br />owners. t-fe felt they would be hemmed i n with a wal 1 f ac i ng_ the <br />hcures artd still ha~.e the noise from the road. He noted that <br />mangy; people Mere concerned about this. <br />Fl~locd Rana, pilot froWi ± ivermore Association, spotce rf traffic <br />patterns and altitudes. He noted that the Pleasantori area is a <br />tr-af f i c corridor and that planes c;~ul d come as 1 ow as f ~ yvr, feet . <br />He wished to point out that ti-se section he was speaking of is <br />the sa:r:e prc.: i mi t yf to the L.i vermcre Hi rport as Sun ~~al i ey i s to <br />Concord and mentioned a mishap that happened there at Ct:ristmas <br />t3f[ie some years agG. <br />',~ohn ~CUltier, ..~4`E~~ ~termont rlcce, Supported tt'te reap :gnmer.t c,f <br />Stoneridge Drive. He saki t-~e feels somewhat deprived because <br />Page 1i <br />