My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 09/21/88
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
PC 09/21/88
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 11:22:47 AM
Creation date
4/13/2007 2:54:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/21/1988
DOCUMENT NAME
PC092188
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP <br />Pleasanton, California <br />Conference Room #1 <br />4665 Bernal Avenue <br />Wednesday, September 21, 1988 <br />7:o0pm <br />CALL TO ORDER <br />The Planning Commission Work Session was called to order at 7:lOpm <br />by Chairperson Sharrell Michelotti. <br />ROLL CALL <br />Commissioners Present: Joyce Berger, Jack Hovingh, <br />Marcelline Mahern, Ben Tarver, and <br />Brian Hoyt, Vice Chairman <br />Commissioner Abstain: Sharrell Michelotti, Chairman <br />(was not in attendance because of possible <br />conflict of interest) <br />Staff Members Present: Chandler Lee, Principal Planner <br />Vice Chairman Hoyt called the meeting to order. <br />The Planning Commission discussed priorities for public <br />improvements within the redevelopment project area. Discussion <br />involved costs of improvements over time and the effect of using <br />tax increment funding on affected taxing agencies. Mr. Lee noted <br />that the base year for the project would be 1988-89 and that tax <br />increments would accrue beginning in Fiscal Year '89-90. <br />The Planning Commissioners discussed the relationship between tax <br />increment cash flow and construction schedules for improvements. <br />The Commissioners inquired as to the feasibility of constructing <br />larger, more expensive projects at the beginning of the project <br />period instead of at the end. The Planning Commissioners <br />expressed interest in prioritizing improvements in the Downtown <br />Specific Plan. <br />The Planning Commissioners discussed the City's negotiations with <br />Alameda County and other taxing agencies. The Planning <br />Commissioners discussed the use of eminent domain and low income <br />housing set aside. <br />Finally, discussion centered around locations and designs of <br />proposed parking lots and what methods would be available to the <br />City for acquiring those properties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.