Laserfiche WebLink
Comrni ssi over t'~Ea3-aern as~:ed I~r. t^9cCarthy i f he sprays the tr ees oro <br />his location. !'fir. McCarthy said he does not. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />CGmiri3Ssioner Hovingh said he would have to support staff`s <br />recommendation for denial as he felt approving it was not fair <br />to other people who mig!-st wish to do the same thing- <br />Commissioner Heyt said he had no real problem with the <br />si tuat i ors , but f ei t the Goer:mission shoal d uphol d the z oni ng 1 aws <br />and should not set a precedent in this case. <br />Commissioner E~erger also supported staff's recommendation. <br />Commissioner Mahern could not find a compelling reason to ct-range <br />the zoning laws and supported staff's recommendation. <br />Chairman Michelotti felt it ayas a difficult case to address as <br />the McCarth•~'s have been excellent neighbors and o•:erall the <br />situation seems to be working quite well; however, she felt <br />approval wouid be setting a precedent and that the Commission <br />shc::ul d uphol d ~-ahat the Ordi narece i nstructs. <br />A motion was made ~y Co~~imissioner Hoyt, seconded by Commissioner <br />Hovingh denying Case AP-88-~1 as the appropriate findings cannot <br />be made. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />r`-1YE5: Commissioners verger, Hov3ngh, Hoyta ~"iahern, and <br />Chairman Michelotti <br />1'dOES: !None <br />AE~SENT: l~lone <br />AHSTAII+I: l~tone <br />Resolution !+.io. F`C-8B-1~1 was entered and adopted denying Case <br />AP-88-.~1 as motioned. <br />The applicant was advised that he has 1~ days in which to appeal <br />the decision to City Council. <br />MATTERS_FOFt_C~MMISSION_S_REVIEW <br />a. Future Planning Calendar <br />P~Jo action necessary. <br />b. Actions of the Council 1?/b/88 <br />E+1o action necessary. <br />Page ? <br />