My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 10/26/88
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
PC 10/26/88
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2013 3:43:38 PM
Creation date
4/13/2007 2:35:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/26/1988
DOCUMENT NAME
PC102688
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
voter approval. He had some problem with the formation of <br />another agency to manage what the City needs to do downtown. He <br />had a problem with taking what he considered Prop. Four money <br />and going forward without voter approval. He felt more <br />comfortable with using Capital Improvement monies to improve the <br />downtown area even if it took a longer period of time. <br />Commissioner Mahern stated that she has spent much time thinking <br />of the Redevelopment Plan and has problems with it. She did not <br />like the idea of taking X26 milion of Pleasanton funds without <br />bringing it to the voters. She does not like the idea of more <br />regulations and red tape. She felt that if the community worked <br />together the downtown area could be revitalized without another <br />layer of bureaucracy. She said she could not support the <br />Redevelopment Plan. <br />Commissioner Hoyt basically agreed with Commissioner Tarver and <br />Mahern. He liked the bare bones of the Plan, but felt <br />uncomfortable with creating another agency and more regulations. <br />He felt that there were ways of revitalizing downtown without <br />using Redevelopment funds. He said he could not support the <br />Plan. <br />Commissioner Hovingh felt that the Redevelopment finds were <br />needed for the City to get some affordable housing. <br />Commissioner Mahern noted that no funds have been allocated for <br />affordable housing. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Mahern, seconded by <br />Commissioner Tarver denying approval of the Redevelopment Plan. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />APES: Commissioners Mahern, Tarver, and Acting Chairman <br />Hoyt <br />I+dOES: Commissioner Hovi ngh <br />AEtSENT: Commissioner Herger <br />APSTAII+l: Chairman Mi chei otti <br />Resolution No. PC-88-11~ was entered and adopted denying <br />approval of the Redevelopment Plan as motioned. <br />The meeting was recessed for five minutes. <br />6P-_99_bs_Augusta/Stanley_Partners <br />Application of Earl Augusta and Stanley Partners to amend the <br />Land Use Element designation of the General Plan from Medium <br />Density Residential to Commercial and Offices or to any other <br />land use designation in the public interest for an approximately <br />one acre site located at 3963 Stanley Boulevard. <br />Page iG <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.