My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 02/10/88
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
PC 02/10/88
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 11:25:14 AM
Creation date
4/13/2007 2:03:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/10/1988
DOCUMENT NAME
PC021088
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REV I S I DIVS AhID DM 155I OhiS TO THE _AGEIVDA <br />i~'tr. nisi#t resguested that Case Ft.1D-i3#.3- -FsLw, Derr:a r~°~°en~ie <br />associates be contirsued tc February ?•~, 1~i3C. the hoard agreed <br />to this cor:tir,arsce. <br />Chairman Lindsey moved Case F't.1D-C~-1}--~~~, F'ro€rsethei_is ts~s the <br /># i rst item i_inder t~-iew E?usi Hess. <br />MATTEFiS_ i iV I T I ATED_SY_CDMIyi I SS I OM_MEMBEF7S <br />Commi ssi of aer iii chel otti said that Stanley F.at`tbone and Li ? 1 y <br />Fiarro had submitted names of senior citizens who had lived a <br />I ong time i rs the F'l easanton area to possibly be i_ised as new <br />street names. She asi;-ed i"1r. Ss.,si#t how thi= might be <br />implemented. ifr. Swi#t replied that designated Harries can be <br />si_ibmi tted to the Ci t4~ Council a€~d also for use by Jewel Dyers. <br />She ash-_ed him ; f the F'l aHni ng Commi ssi un could invite t: to <br />Jewel oper-s to i oo~:_ at ti-tese names and possibly i ncorpor--ate them <br />into Heat streets. h1r. Swi#.i replied that they could do this. <br />Cotrirni ssi offer Tarver wondered whett-ser the Commissioners woixl d <br />st_ipport sta## loo~:irsg into and ma~iiHg same recommendation abo~et <br />hi l 1 si de dowel Gp€iier :t, ei trier i n the # orsai of gut del i nos or <br />ordiHances so as not to have a repeat of the F'resiey probe;=t <br />which car: be time consi_imiHg #or both developer, sta##, and <br />Ct7s:is7ii ssi oners. Fie #el t i t would be appropriate to sTiak:s? some <br />gut de3 i nos regardi ng the arrioi_int of gradi Hg allowed aHd what the <br />visual impact should be. t-te was s_dHder the i mpress off tE3at at <br />one time Counci'~ had ti'sat typ;= of guideliHe arsd had come to the <br />coHClusioH that it would be best to decide on a case by case <br />basis. <br />Chat r€nan Li Hdset,: stated that he did Hot support the F'r'e=l ey <br />development. 1-ie felt tt-sat ewers as cumbersome as it is #or sta## <br />and the developer that this must be done on a case by case <br />basis. Fie was appreherssi ve about creati Hg a gi_ii del i rse regardi Hg <br />hiiiside gradiHsg lest it be interpreted as policy. <br />Comrni ssi offer i'fii c; set otti as~~ed Mr. Swift about the preseHt <br />gut del i He regardi Hg slopes. H;= replied that tt-ier e i s How <br />genera3i~ed criteria that says to restrict development off <br />steeper slopes but does not give any real direction. <br />Comrrsassioner Michelotti thought there would be Ho harm iHto <br />1 ooE.i Hg i Hto the sTsai:.i ng of guidelines, but was apprehensi :fe <br />abor_it any def i Hi to pol i c}f or ordinance. <br />Comrni ssi offer- cserger supported Cofit€€si ssi oner- Tarver arsd # el t that <br />ti'-se time ~oLii d be used better b;,~ ti-se staf# and ti-se Jewel oiler i # <br />some type of guideliHe were iH e##ect. <br />Comma ssi oner' Mai-serH agreed wi tis Cammg ssi offers Tarver arsd Der ger , <br />addi Hg that site # el t the developer woi_iI d appreciate some type of <br />standard or guideline. <br />F'age <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.